[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH for-4.14 v2 2/2] x86/passthrough: introduce a flag for GSIs not requiring an EOI or unmask

To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 10:44:34 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, paul@xxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 10:44:42 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 04:29:23PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> There's no need to setup a timer for GSIs that are edge triggered,
> since those don't require any EIO or unmask, and hence couldn't block

One small nit. I think you meant "EOI" here.

References:
- [PATCH for-4.14 v2 0/2] x86/passthrough: fixes for PVH dom0 edge triggered interrupts
  - From: Roger Pau Monne
- [PATCH for-4.14 v2 2/2] x86/passthrough: introduce a flag for GSIs not requiring an EOI or unmask
  - From: Roger Pau Monne

Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH v2 00/10] Coverity fixes for vchan-socket-proxy
Next by Date: Re: Kexec and libxenctlr.so
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH for-4.14 v2 2/2] x86/passthrough: introduce a flag for GSIs not requiring an EOI or unmask
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v10 1/9] error: auto propagated local_err
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.