Re: [PATCH for-4.14 v2 2/2] x86/passthrough: introduce a flag for GSIs not requiring an EOI or unmask

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 11.06.2020 19:11, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: 11 June 2020 17:26
>> To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: paul@xxxxxxx; Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.14 v2 2/2] x86/passthrough: introduce a flag for 
>> GSIs not requiring an EOI
>> or unmask
>>
>> On 10/06/2020 15:29, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> There's no need to setup a timer for GSIs that are edge triggered,
>>> since those don't require any EIO or unmask, and hence couldn't block
>>> other interrupts.
>>>
>>> Note this is only used by PVH dom0, that can setup the passthrough of
>>> edge triggered interrupts from the vIO-APIC. One example of such kind
>>> of interrupt that can be used by a PVH dom0 would be the RTC timer.
>>>
>>> While there introduce an out label to do the unlock and reduce code
>>> duplication.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Release-acked-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xxxxxxx>

Strictly speaking these tags were too little for the patch to go
in - the change to drivers/passthrough/io.c would also have
required Paul's (or my) R-b. I take it that this was sort of
implied by the R-a-b.

Jan