[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH for-4.14 8/8] x86/hvm: enable emulated PIT for PVH dom0


  • To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:33:33 +0100
  • Authentication-results: esa6.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none
  • Cc: Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, paul@xxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:33:51 +0000
  • Ironport-sdr: 7QT1MsNHvao7+56qherYyjnDUwjmRMJyADuszo0B1FsRffN16rSslb3luoG4+947Gkee50EOks kNCrfj3kJVnCQBbfvRdL5+KU3sd366mAMi6VAtr88hAum3HtAPmm125Kp8HsAsRg4QAwsGU6FR v3BgveZu1BtggJ+antYiwbzrCKaWN+od2KT71OruL4zd9pC6EH/5NPW8yzwT7JiS+bd2WKAQ2y V+lRcsvMIjm0LyGiS16qN91hrdustsNHpLS4Rrh2Yypii31S+MgdLLOlYvuqOvrFakr2OzjNqN rCg=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 12/06/2020 16:56, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Some video BIOS require a PIT in order to work properly, hence classic
> PV dom0 gets partial access to the physical PIT as long as it's not in
> use by Xen.

Is this actually true today?

I can believe that it may have been necessary on old hardware, but the
structure of systems has changed massively over the past 20 years, and
the PIT is very legacy these days.

We shouldn't be blindly propagating bodges like this forward.

~Andrew



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.