[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/vvmx: fix virtual interrupt injection when Ack on exit control is used
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 01:35:05AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > From: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 8:19 PM > > > > When doing a virtual vmexit (ie: a vmexit handled by the L1 VMM) > > interrupts shouldn't be injected using the virtual interrupt delivery > > mechanism unless the Ack on exit vmexit control bit isn't set in the > > nested vmcs. > > > > Gate the call to nvmx_update_apicv helper on whether the nested vmcs > > has the Ack on exit bit set in the vmexit control field. > > > > Note that this fixes the usage of x2APIC by the L1 VMM, at least when > > the L1 VMM is Xen. > > > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, with a small comment: > > > --- > > Changes since v1: > > - Call nvmx_update_apicv if the "Ack on exit" vmexit control bit > > isn't set. > > --- > > xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c | 7 ++++++- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c > > index d8ab167d62..3d97a293b2 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c > > @@ -1393,7 +1393,12 @@ static void virtual_vmexit(struct cpu_user_regs > > *regs) > > /* updating host cr0 to sync TS bit */ > > __vmwrite(HOST_CR0, v->arch.hvm.vmx.host_cr0); > > > > - if ( cpu_has_vmx_virtual_intr_delivery ) > > + if ( cpu_has_vmx_virtual_intr_delivery && > > + /* > > + * Only inject the vector if the Ack on exit bit is not set, else > > the > > + * interrupt will be signaled in the vmcs VM_EXIT_INTR_INFO field. > > + */ > > + !(get_vvmcs(v, VM_EXIT_CONTROLS) & VM_EXIT_ACK_INTR_ON_EXIT) ) > > It's a bit odd to put comment between code lines. Can you move it to > the line before 'if'? I usually try to keep the comments as close to the code it references as possible, even if that means adding them in the middle of an if condition. I don't mind moving it, but maybe the committer can do it at commit time? Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |