|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 1/7] x86/p2m: Allow p2m_get_page_from_gfn to return shared entries
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:24 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 03.02.2020 17:12, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > The owner domain of shared pages is dom_cow, use that for get_page
> > otherwise the function fails to return the correct page under some
> > situations. The check if dom_cow should be used was only performed in
> > a subset of use-cases. Fixing the error and simplifying the existing check
> > since we can't have any shared entries with dom_cow being NULL.
>
> Better, thanks.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.lengyel@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v7: update commit message
> > ---
> > xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c | 14 ++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> > index def13f657b..007fef720d 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> > @@ -575,11 +575,12 @@ struct page_info *p2m_get_page_from_gfn(
> > if ( fdom == NULL )
> > page = NULL;
> > }
> > - else if ( !get_page(page, p2m->domain) &&
> > - /* Page could be shared */
> > - (!dom_cow || !p2m_is_shared(*t) ||
> > - !get_page(page, dom_cow)) )
> > - page = NULL;
> > + else
> > + {
> > + struct domain *d = !p2m_is_shared(*t) ? p2m->domain :
> > dom_cow;
> > + if ( !get_page(page, d) )
>
> There's still a blank line missing between these two lines and ...
>
> > + page = NULL;
> > + }
> > }
> > p2m_read_unlock(p2m);
> >
> > @@ -595,8 +596,9 @@ struct page_info *p2m_get_page_from_gfn(
> > mfn = get_gfn_type_access(p2m, gfn_x(gfn), t, a, q, NULL);
> > if ( p2m_is_ram(*t) && mfn_valid(mfn) )
> > {
> > + struct domain *d = !p2m_is_shared(*t) ? p2m->domain : dom_cow;
> > page = mfn_to_page(mfn);
>
> ... similarly between these two. As indicated before, with them
> added
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> despite me still thinking that the title suggests more of a
> problem than there really was. (Of course adding the missing
> blank lines ought to be easy enough while committing.)
Thanks, I did forgot to add those extra lines. To me this looks fine
as-is so it just doesn't come to mind naturally.
Tamas
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |