|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 11/18] x86/mem_sharing: Replace MEM_SHARING_DEBUG with gdprintk
On 21.01.2020 18:49, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> @@ -538,24 +535,26 @@ static int audit(void)
> d = get_domain_by_id(g->domain);
> if ( d == NULL )
> {
> - MEM_SHARING_DEBUG("Unknown dom: %hu, for PFN=%lx, MFN=%lx\n",
> - g->domain, g->gfn, mfn_x(mfn));
> + gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR,
> + "Unknown dom: %pd, for PFN=%lx, MFN=%lx\n",
> + d, g->gfn, mfn_x(mfn));
With "if ( d == NULL )" around this you hardly mean to pass d to
the function here. This is a case where you really need to stick
to logging a raw number.
> errors++;
> continue;
> }
> o_mfn = get_gfn_query_unlocked(d, g->gfn, &t);
> if ( !mfn_eq(o_mfn, mfn) )
> {
> - MEM_SHARING_DEBUG("Incorrect P2M for d=%hu, PFN=%lx."
> - "Expecting MFN=%lx, got %lx\n",
> - g->domain, g->gfn, mfn_x(mfn),
> mfn_x(o_mfn));
> + gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Incorrect P2M for d=%pd, PFN=%lx."
Here and elsewhere may I recommend dropping d= (or dom= further
down)?
> @@ -757,10 +756,10 @@ static int debug_mfn(mfn_t mfn)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - MEM_SHARING_DEBUG(
> - "Debug page: MFN=%lx is ci=%lx, ti=%lx, owner=%pd\n",
> - mfn_x(page_to_mfn(page)), page->count_info,
> - page->u.inuse.type_info, page_get_owner(page));
> + gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR,
> + "Debug page: MFN=%lx is ci=%lx, ti=%lx, owner_id=%d\n",
> + mfn_x(page_to_mfn(page)), page->count_info,
> + page->u.inuse.type_info, page_get_owner(page)->domain_id);
As indicated before (I think), please prefer %pd and a struct domain
pointer over passing ->domain_id (at least one more instance further
down).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |