On 10/09/2019, 16:31, "Julien Grall" <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
Actually, I have one question about the template (my ack still stands).
On 9/10/19 4:18 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> On 9/4/19 12:30 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
>> This change provides sufficient information to allow get_maintainer.pl /
>> add_maintainers.pl scripts to be run on xen sister repositories such as
>> mini-os.git, osstest.git, etc
>>
>> A suggested template for sister repositories of Xen is
>>
>> ========================================================
>> This file follows the same conventions as outlined in
>> xen.git:MAINTAINERS. Please refer to the file in xen.git
>> for more information.
>>
>> THE REST
>> M: MAINTAINER1 <maintainer1@xxxxxxxxx>
>> M: MAINTAINER2 <maintainer2@xxxxxxxxx>
>> L: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I was under the impression that the scripts would be used for Unikraft.
If so, do we expect them to CC xen-devel everytime?
In that case, the template has to be adapted. I was mainly thinking of
XTF, OSSTEST, livepatch-build-tools. If it were used say for minios
(which I think it should) the L: field would obviously need changing
Once this series is through, I will submit maintainer files for all those
projects making sure that they have the right L: field.
If the answer is no, then we will probably want to add_maintainers.pl.
I basically dropped the original patch for Unikraft as nobody has responded.
I was not planning to pick this up, unless someone from Unikraft runs with it
