[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] After upgrade to Xen 4.12.0 iommu=no-igfx
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 02:03:24PM -0700, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:46 PM Andrew Cooper > <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 31/07/2019 20:35, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 1:43 AM Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:36:31AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > >>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:55:24AM -0700, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > >>>> Sorry -- got a bit distracted yesterday. Attached is the log with only > > >>>> your latest patch attached. Interestingly enough the box booted fine > > >>>> without screen artifacts. So I guess we're getting closer... > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks for all the help! > > >>> That's quite weird, there's no functional changes between the > > >>> previous patches and this one, the only difference is that this patch > > >>> has more verbose output. > > >>> > > >>> Are you sure you didn't have any local patches on top of Xen that > > >>> could explain this difference in behaviour? > > >> FWIW, can you please try the plain patch again: > > >> > > >> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-07/msg01547.html > > >> > > >> And report back? > > >> > > >> I would like to get this committed ASAP if it does fix your issue. > > > I'd like to say that it did -- but I tried it again just now and it > > > still garbled screen and tons of: > > > > > > (XEN) printk: 26665 messages suppressed. > > > (XEN) [VT-D]DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [0000:00:02.0] fault addr > > > 8e14c000, iommu reg = ffff82c0008de000 > > > > > > I'm very much confused by what's going on, but it seems that's the > > > case -- adding those debug print statements make the issue go away > > > > > > Here are the patches that are being applied: > > > NOT WORKING: > > > https://github.com/rvs/eve/blob/xen-bug/pkg/xen/01-iommu-mappings.patch > > > > > > WORKING: > > > https://github.com/rvs/eve/blob/a1291fcd4e669df2a63285afb5e8b4841f45c1c8/pkg/xen/01-iommu-mappings.patch > > > > > > At this point I'm really not sure what's going on. > > > > Ok. seeing as you've double checked this, the mystery deepens. > > > > My bet is on the intel_iommu_lookup_page() call having side effects[1]. > > If you take out the debugging in the middle of the loop in > > rmrr_identity_mapping(), does the problem reproduce again? > > > > ~Andrew > > > > [1] Looking at the internals of addr_to_dma_page_maddr(), it does 100% > > more memory allocation and higher-level PTE construction than looks wise > > for what is supposed to be a getter. > > Yup. That's what it is -- intel_iommu_lookup_page() seems to be the culprit. > > I've did the experiment in the other direction -- adding a dummy call: > > https://github.com/rvs/eve/blob/36aeeaa7c0a53474fb1ecef2ff587a86637df858/pkg/xen/01-iommu-mappings.patch#L23 > on top of original Roger's patch makes system boot NORMALLY. I'm again quite lost, and I don't really understand why mappings added by arch_iommu_hwdom_init seems to work fine while mappings added by rmrr_identity_mapping don't. I have yet another patch for you to try, which attempts to mimic exactly what arch_iommu_hwdom_init does into rmrr_identity_mapping, can you please give it a try? This has the added bonus of limiting the use of {set/clear}_identity_p2m_entry to translated domains only, since rmrr_identity_mapping was the only caller against PV domains. Thanks, Roger. ---8<--- diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c index fef97c82f6..d36a58b1a6 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c @@ -1341,10 +1341,8 @@ int set_identity_p2m_entry(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn_l, if ( !paging_mode_translate(p2m->domain) ) { - if ( !need_iommu_pt_sync(d) ) - return 0; - return iommu_legacy_map(d, _dfn(gfn_l), _mfn(gfn_l), PAGE_ORDER_4K, - IOMMUF_readable | IOMMUF_writable); + ASSERT_UNREACHABLE(); + return -ENXIO; } gfn_lock(p2m, gfn, 0); @@ -1432,9 +1430,8 @@ int clear_identity_p2m_entry(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn_l) if ( !paging_mode_translate(d) ) { - if ( !need_iommu_pt_sync(d) ) - return 0; - return iommu_legacy_unmap(d, _dfn(gfn_l), PAGE_ORDER_4K); + ASSERT_UNREACHABLE(); + return -ENXIO; } gfn_lock(p2m, gfn, 0); diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c index 5d72270c5b..62df5ca5aa 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c @@ -1969,6 +1969,7 @@ static int rmrr_identity_mapping(struct domain *d, bool_t map, unsigned long end_pfn = PAGE_ALIGN_4K(rmrr->end_address) >> PAGE_SHIFT_4K; struct mapped_rmrr *mrmrr; struct domain_iommu *hd = dom_iommu(d); + unsigned int flush_flags = 0; ASSERT(pcidevs_locked()); ASSERT(rmrr->base_address < rmrr->end_address); @@ -1982,7 +1983,7 @@ static int rmrr_identity_mapping(struct domain *d, bool_t map, if ( mrmrr->base == rmrr->base_address && mrmrr->end == rmrr->end_address ) { - int ret = 0; + int ret = 0, err; if ( map ) { @@ -1995,13 +1996,20 @@ static int rmrr_identity_mapping(struct domain *d, bool_t map, while ( base_pfn < end_pfn ) { - if ( clear_identity_p2m_entry(d, base_pfn) ) - ret = -ENXIO; + if ( paging_mode_translate(d) ) + ret = clear_identity_p2m_entry(d, base_pfn); + else + ret = iommu_unmap(d, _dfn(base_pfn), PAGE_ORDER_4K, + &flush_flags); base_pfn++; } list_del(&mrmrr->list); xfree(mrmrr); + /* Keep the previous error code if there's one. */ + err = iommu_iotlb_flush_all(d, flush_flags); + if ( !ret ) + ret = err; return ret; } } @@ -2011,8 +2019,13 @@ static int rmrr_identity_mapping(struct domain *d, bool_t map, while ( base_pfn < end_pfn ) { - int err = set_identity_p2m_entry(d, base_pfn, p2m_access_rw, flag); + int err; + if ( paging_mode_translate(d) ) + err = set_identity_p2m_entry(d, base_pfn, p2m_access_rw, flag); + else + err = iommu_map(d, _dfn(base_pfn), _mfn(base_pfn), PAGE_ORDER_4K, + IOMMUF_readable | IOMMUF_writable, &flush_flags); if ( err ) return err; base_pfn++; @@ -2026,7 +2039,7 @@ static int rmrr_identity_mapping(struct domain *d, bool_t map, mrmrr->count = 1; list_add_tail(&mrmrr->list, &hd->arch.mapped_rmrrs); - return 0; + return iommu_iotlb_flush_all(d, flush_flags); } static int intel_iommu_add_device(u8 devfn, struct pci_dev *pdev) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |