Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] CODING_STYLE: list further brace placement exceptions

[Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jan,

Jan Beulich writes:

> For easy spotting of struct/union/enum definitions we already commonly
> place the opening braces on the initial line of such a definition.
>
> We also often don't place the opening brace of an initializer on a
> separate line.
>
> And finally for compound literals placing the braces on separate lines
> often makes the code more difficult to read, so it should (and in
> practice does) typically go on the same line as well.  The placement of
> the closing brace often depends on how large such a compound literal is.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> TBD: We may want to make explicit that for initializers both forms are
>       fine.
>
> --- a/CODING_STYLE
> +++ b/CODING_STYLE
> @@ -64,8 +64,13 @@ Bracing
>   -------
>
>   Braces ('{' and '}') are usually placed on a line of their own, except
> -for the do/while loop.  This is unlike the Linux coding style and
> -unlike K&R.  do/while loops are an exception. e.g.:
> +for
> +- the do/while loop
> +- the opening brace in definitions of enum, struct, and union
> +- the opening brace in initializers
> +- compound literals
Looks like this leaves us only with "if/else", "for", "switch" and
various forms of "for_each_*". So maybe it is worth to rewrite this
in the opposite manner? Like this:

Braces ('{' and '}') are usually placed on the same line, except the
following cases:

 - if, else, for, switch statements
 - for_each_* iterators like for_each_vcpu

> +This is unlike the Linux coding style and unlike K&R.  do/while loops
There is extra space before "do/while".

> +are one exception. e.g.:
>
>   if ( condition )
>   {
>


--
Volodymyr Babchuk at EPAM
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel