[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 09/10] tools/arm: tee: add "tee" option for xl.cfg





On 6/18/19 3:30 PM, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:


Julien Grall writes:

On 18/06/2019 12:19, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:

Hi Julien,

Hi,


Julien Grall writes:
+
+=item B<optee>
+
+Allow a guest to use OP-TEE. Note that a virtualization-aware OP-TEE
+is required for this. If this option is selected, guest will be able

OOI, what happen if OP-TEE does not support virtualization. Will Xen
forbid to use it?
Yes, Xen will get an error from OP-TEE during domain construction. This
will lead to domain creation failure.

This is a bit odd. It means we have no way to know in advance whether
OP-TEE will be able to create a client.
Yes. There can be at least two reasons for this:
1. OP-TEE is built without virtualization support at all
2. OP-TEE have no resources for a new guest

In other word, when the
mediator is built in Xen, all existing setup with OP-TEE (and
no-virtualization) will fail.
Right. If user provides DTB with 'optee' node, but OP-TEE is build without
virtualization support, Dom0 will not be created. This can be fixed by
adding new capability flag into OP-TEE, that tells Xen about
virtualization support. For some reason I missed this when I implemented
VM support in OP-TEE :(

My expectation is Xen should be able to know whether the mediator can be used.
I need to implement additional capability flag in the OP-TEE. This is
not so hard, but it will be available only in the next release. For now,
we can document this limitation somewhere.

Is OP-TEE already released with virtualization? If not, when will it be?



+to access to the real OP-TEE OS running on the host. Guest creation

s/real// it is redundant with the rest of the sentence. However, it
does not really answer to the question regarding isolation.
Your assumption is correct - OP-TEE provides isolation on its side.


+will fail if OP-TEE have no resources for a new guest. Number of supported
+guests depends on OP-TEE configuration.

How about the following description (correct me if my understanding is
wrong):

"Allow a guest to access the host OP-TEE OS. Xen will mediate the
access to OP-TEE and the resource isolation will be provided directly
by OP-TEE. OP-TEE itself may limit the number of guests that can
concurrently use it. This requires a virtualization-aware OP-TEE for
this to work.

This feature is a B<technology preview>."
That's much better than my version. Thank you.

How can a user know whether OP-TEE supports virtualization? Is it
configurable at build?
Yes, there is a special configuration option CFG_VIRTUALIZATION. This is
covered in OP-TEE documentation at [1]

[1] https://optee.readthedocs.io/architecture/virtualization.html

Do we expect the link to be stable? If so, then I think a link in the
documentation would be useful.
This is the official OP-TEE documentation. So, yes, it should be stable.
I can put this link into the code somewhere.

I would add the link in the xl documentation and also in the commit message of patch #2. I can do the later on commit.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.