Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 02/10] xen/arm: optee: add OP-TEE header files

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Looking at https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html and also
looking at the usage in the Linux kernel, I am pretty sure it is
compatible. However, given that the Xen hypervisor as a whole is GPLv2,
I think it would be more precise to say:

SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)


On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> hmm, I forgot to CC lars. Sorry for that.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> On 15/06/2019 19:39, Julien Grall wrote:
> > (+ Lars)
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 6/11/19 7:46 PM, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> > > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/tee/optee_msg.h
> > > b/xen/include/asm-arm/tee/optee_msg.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000000..fe743dbde3
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/tee/optee_msg.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause */
> > 
> > Hmmm, sorry I haven't noticed it until now (SDPX is more explicit that the
> > full-blown license). I suspect this is fine to have BSD-2 Clause license in
> > Xen but I want to confirmation from someone knowing more than me about
> > license compatibility. Lars?
> > 
> > If this is fine, then I would like to add a word in the commit message (I am
> > happy to do that on commit).
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Julien Grall
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel