|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 13/13] print: introduce a format specifier for pci_sbdf_t
>>> On 07.06.19 at 11:22, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The new format specifier is '%pp', and prints a pci_sbdf_t using the
> seg:bus:dev.func format. Replace all SBDFs printed using
> '%04x:%02x:%02x.%u' to use the new format specifier.
Well, I continue to not be happy about the use of %p (rather than the
proposed %o) here. I don't suppose you've actually tried, and it didn't
work out?
> --- a/xen/common/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/xen/common/vsprintf.c
> @@ -394,6 +394,20 @@ static char *print_vcpu(char *str, const char *end,
> const struct vcpu *v)
> return number(str + 1, end, v->vcpu_id, 10, -1, -1, 0);
> }
>
> +static char *print_pci_addr(char *str, const char *end, const pci_sbdf_t
> *sbdf)
> +{
> + str = number(str, end, sbdf->seg, 16, 4, -1, ZEROPAD);
> + if ( str < end )
> + *str = ':';
> + str = number(str + 1, end, sbdf->bus, 16, 2, -1, ZEROPAD);
> + if ( str < end )
> + *str = ':';
> + str = number(str + 1, end, sbdf->dev, 16, 2, -1, ZEROPAD);
> + if ( str < end )
> + *str = '.';
> + return number(str + 1, end, sbdf->fn, 8, -1, -1, 0);
Nit: Blank line above here please.
> +}
> +
> static char *pointer(char *str, const char *end, const char **fmt_ptr,
> const void *arg, int field_width, int precision,
> int flags)
> @@ -476,6 +490,10 @@ static char *pointer(char *str, const char *end, const
> char **fmt_ptr,
> }
> }
>
> + case 'p': /* PCI SBDF. */
Another nit: The full stop would imo better be omitted here. I notice this
is inconsistent at present in this function, but generally I think it's better
to not have it when a comment is not really a sentence. The style
guidelines explicitly permit omitting it iirc.
> + ++*fmt_ptr;
> + return print_pci_addr(str, end, arg);
> +
> case 's': /* Symbol name with offset and size (iff offset != 0) */
> case 'S': /* Symbol name unconditionally with offset and size */
> {
In principle I'd expect this to not even build on Arm, as pci_sbdf_t should
not be defined. I guess you did build test it and it worked, but I think the
additions should still go in #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PCI.
Also I'd like to point out that again review and in particular collection of
acks might be easier if this got split up a little. But I'm not going to insist.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |