Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 2] [DO NOT APPLY] introduce VCPUOP_register_runstate_phys_memory_area hypercall

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Andrii,

I am not answering on the content yet, I will do that separately. The threading 
for this series looks quite confusing. The head of the thread is this patch (i.e 
RFC 2) but then you have a cover letter within the thread tagged "V3".
From what I understand, the 2 e-mails tagged "V3" is the original version where 
as RFC 2 and RFC 3 are variants. Am I correct?
If so, for next time, I would recommend to have the cover letter first and then 
all the patches send "In-Reply-To" the cover letter. This makes easier to track 
series.
Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel