[Xen-devel] [PATCH MM-PART2 RESEND v2 03/19] xen/arm: processor: Use BIT(.., UL) instead of _AC(1, U) in SCTLR_ defines

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

Use the pattern BIT(..., UL) to make the code more readable. Note that
unsigned long is used instead of unsigned because SCTLR is technically
32-bit on Arm32 and 64-bit on Arm64.

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>

---
    Changes in v2:
        - Rework the patch to use BIT(..., UL) instead of _BITUL(...).
---
 xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h
index f3b68185eb..bbcba061ca 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h
@@ -120,20 +120,20 @@
 
 /* Bits specific to SCTLR_EL1 for Arm32 */
 
-#define SCTLR_A32_EL1_V     (_AC(1,U)<<13)
+#define SCTLR_A32_EL1_V     BIT(13, UL)
 
 /* Common bits for SCTLR_ELx for Arm32 */
 
-#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_TE    (_AC(1,U)<<30)
-#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_FI    (_AC(1,U)<<21)
+#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_TE    BIT(30, UL)
+#define SCTLR_A32_ELx_FI    BIT(21, UL)
 
 /* Common bits for SCTLR_ELx on all architectures */
-#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_EE    (_AC(1,U)<<25)
-#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_WXN   (_AC(1,U)<<19)
-#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_I     (_AC(1,U)<<12)
-#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_C     (_AC(1,U)<<2)
-#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_A     (_AC(1,U)<<1)
-#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_M     (_AC(1,U)<<0)
+#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_EE    BIT(25, UL)
+#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_WXN   BIT(19, UL)
+#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_I     BIT(12, UL)
+#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_C     BIT(2, UL)
+#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_A     BIT(1, UL)
+#define SCTLR_Axx_ELx_M     BIT(0, UL)
 
 #define HSCTLR_BASE     _AC(0x30c51878,U)
 
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel