Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.13 Development Update

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 25.04.19 at 17:32, <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 25/04/2019 16:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 25.04.19 at 16:57, <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 15/04/2019 06:25, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>> This email only tracks big items for xen.git tree. Please reply for items 
>>>> you
>>>> would like to see in 4.13 so that people have an idea what is going on and
>>>> prioritise accordingly.
>>>
>>> Those e-mails become easily unnoticed on xen-devel when you are not CCed. 
>>> In all
>>> honesty, I probably missed the all those e-mails for the past year because 
>>> they
>>> didn't land in my inbox. Yes I think they are important for the maintainers 
>>> to
>>> see what's going on.
>> 
>> So you're not subscribed to xen-devel?
> 
> Not everyone has time to go through xen-devel. I only received e-mail where I 
> am 
> CCed in my inbox. All the others are queued in a folder.

Oh, so just a matter of terminology. This means you still get them,
you just have to fish them out.

>>> Could we find a way to easily filter them? On IRC, Juergen suggested 
>>> [Procces].
>>> Any opinions?
>> 
>> How would a tag help? That tag would be there on all the replies
>> of people not trimming the Cc lists. And if you asked them to drop
>> the tag, they'd surely honor the request as much as they do
>> honor the Cc list clipping one.
> 
> I honestly don't expect a low volume of e-mail on such tagged e-mail. So I 
> don't 
> see any concern here.

I'm confused by your reply: Either you inverted the sense and
meant you don't expect a high volume of mails, or you really
love getting mountains of mail.

And just to be clear - I'm not really opposed to the tagging
approach, I'm merely afraid that it'll not help and / or get
abused (again).

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel