Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 5/7] x86/dom0: Improve dom0= useability

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 16.01.19 at 20:58, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 16/01/2019 14:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>>> -        and the hardware must have VT-x/SVM extensions available.
>>> +    *   For a PVH dom0, the hardware must have VT-x/SVM extensions 
>>> available.
>>>  
>>>  *   The `shadow` boolean is only applicable when dom0 is constructed as a 
>>> PVH
>>>      guest, and controls whether dom0 uses hardware assisted paging, or 
>>> shadow
>> As an aside - is this restriction still necessary, now that the code
>> was fixed to allow shadow enabling for L1TF even for Dom0?
> 
> I see your point, but the documentation here currently matches the
> behaviour of Xen, therefore shouldn't change.

Oh, of course I didn't mean to change the doc without also
removing the restriction from actual code.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel