[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen/arm: gic: Ensure we have an ISB between ack and do_IRQ()

To: Andrii Anisov <Andrii_Anisov@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 17:47:12 +0000
Cc: "andre.przywara@xxxxxxx" <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>, "sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx" <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Oleksandr Tyshchenko <Oleksandr_Tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 17:47:28 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>



On 09/11/2018 14:42, Andrii Anisov wrote:

Hello Julien,


Hi Andrii,


I just wonder, do you plan to upstream the patch below?

I don't plan to upstream the patch below. Andre and I discussed about itextensively and haven't found potential issue with the 2 vGIC implementation wehave in Xen.


Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen/arm: gic: Ensure we have an ISB between ack and do_IRQ()
  - From: Andrii Anisov

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 15/15] libxl: Re-implement domain_suspend_device_model using libxl__ev_qmp
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] guest/pvh: fix handling of multiboot info and module list
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen/arm: gic: Ensure we have an ISB between ack and do_IRQ()
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen/arm: gic: Ensure we have an ISB between ack and do_IRQ()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.