[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] idle/x86: remove the call to boot_init_stack_canary() from cpu_startup_entry()
Hi Christophe, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on xen-tip/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.19 next-20181019] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Christophe-Leroy/idle-x86-remove-the-call-to-boot_init_stack_canary-from-cpu_startup_entry/20181020-061217 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git linux-next config: x86_64-rhel (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0 reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64 All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c: In function 'cpu_bringup_and_idle': >> arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c:91:2: error: implicit declaration of function >> 'boot_init_stack_canary'; did you mean 'snprint_stack_trace'? >> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] boot_init_stack_canary(); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ snprint_stack_trace cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +91 arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c 87 88 asmlinkage __visible void cpu_bringup_and_idle(void) 89 { 90 cpu_bringup(); > 91 boot_init_stack_canary(); 92 cpu_startup_entry(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE); 93 } 94 --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation Attachment:
.config.gz _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |