[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] (xen-swiotlb) stable/for-linus-4.20

To: konrad@xxxxxxxxxx
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 11:05:54 +0100
Cc: joe.jin@xxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 10:06:22 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:33 PM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   one tiny fix for the Xen SWIOTLB mechanism that occasionally happened with
> devices that didn't allocate size in power of two but rather some odd
> sizes. We neglected to make the memory coherent leading to all kinds of fun 
> crashes.

Pulled,

                  Linus

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] (xen-swiotlb) stable/for-linus-4.20
  - From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 128920: regressions - FAIL
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/boot: enable NMIs during cpu_init()
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] (xen-swiotlb) stable/for-linus-4.20
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline baseline-only test] 75479: trouble: blocked/broken
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.