[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 22/25] xen/arm: Allow vpl011 to be used by DomU





On 03/10/2018 22:21, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Julien Grall wrote:
On 16/08/18 20:21, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Stefano,

On 01/08/18 00:28, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Make vpl011 being able to be used without a userspace component in Dom0.
In that case, output is printed to the Xen serial and input is received
from the Xen serial one character at a time.

Call domain_vpl011_init during construct_domU if vpl011 is enabled.

Introduce a new ring struct with only the ring array to avoid a waste of
memory. Introduce separate read_data and write_data functions for
initial domains: vpl011_write_data_xen is very simple and just writes
to the console, while vpl011_read_data_xen is a duplicate of
vpl011_read_data. Although textually almost identical, we are forced to
duplicate the functions because the struct layout is different.

Output characters are printed one by one, potentially leading to
intermixed output of different domains on the console. A follow-up patch
will solve the issue by introducing buffering.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v3:
- add in-code comments
- improve existing comments
- remove ifdef around domain_vpl011_init in construct_domU
- add ASSERT
- use SBSA_UART_FIFO_SIZE for in buffer size
- rename ring_enable to backend_in_domain
- rename struct xencons_in to struct vpl011_xen_backend
- rename inring field to xen
- rename helper functions accordingly
- remove unnecessary stub implementation of vpl011_rx_char
- move vpl011_rx_char_xen within the file to avoid the need of a forward
     declaration of vpl011_data_avail
- fix small bug in vpl011_rx_char_xen: increment in_prod before using it
     to check xencons_queued.

Changes in v2:
- only init if vpl011
- rename vpl011_read_char to vpl011_rx_char
- remove spurious change
- fix coding style
- use different ring struct
- move the write_data changes to their own function
     (vpl011_write_data_noring)
- duplicate vpl011_read_data
---
    xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c  |   9 +-
    xen/arch/arm/vpl011.c        | 198
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
    xen/include/asm-arm/vpl011.h |   8 ++
    3 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index f9fa484..0888a76 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -2638,7 +2638,14 @@ static int __init construct_domU(struct domain
*d,
struct dt_device_node *node)
        if ( rc < 0 )
            return rc;
    -    return __construct_domain(d, &kinfo);
+    rc = __construct_domain(d, &kinfo);
+    if ( rc < 0 )
+        return rc;
+
+    if ( kinfo.vpl011 )
+        rc = domain_vpl011_init(d, NULL);
+
+    return rc;
    }
      void __init create_domUs(void)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpl011.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpl011.c
index 725a203..f206c61 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/vpl011.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpl011.c
@@ -77,6 +77,91 @@ static void vpl011_update_interrupt_status(struct
domain
*d)
    #endif
    }
    +/*
+ * vpl011_write_data_xen writes chars from the vpl011 out buffer to the
+ * console. Only to be used when the backend is Xen.
+ */
+static void vpl011_write_data_xen(struct domain *d, uint8_t data)
+{
+    unsigned long flags;
+    struct vpl011 *vpl011 = &d->arch.vpl011;
+
+    VPL011_LOCK(d, flags);
+
+    printk("%c", data);
+    if (data == '\n')
+        printk("DOM%u: ", d->domain_id);

There are a problem in this code. The first line of a domain will always
printed without "DOM%u: " in front. This means you don't really know where
it
is coming from until you get the second line.

This problem is solved by the follow-up patch that introduces characters
buffering. I'll mention it in the commit message.

To be honest, this should be solved in this patch and not the follow-up one.

I agree. I kept them separate to make them easier to review. Would you
be OK with me merging the two patches into one once they have both been
acked? Otherwise, if you prefer that I merge them now, let me know.

I am ok to have them merged when committing.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.