[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/mm: re-indent after "re-arrange get_page_from_l<N>e() vs pv_l1tf_check_l<N>e()"

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:59:01 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:59:15 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:01:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> That earlier change introduced two "else switch ()" constructs which now
> get converted back to "normal" style (indentation). To limit indentation
> depth, a conditional gets inverted in ptwr_emulated_update().
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Requested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/mm: re-indent after "re-arrange get_page_from_l<N>e() vs pv_l1tf_check_l<N>e()"
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.11-testing baseline-only test] 75252: trouble: blocked/broken
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH] x86/mm: re-indent after "re-arrange get_page_from_l<N>e() vs pv_l1tf_check_l<N>e()"
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/mm: re-indent after "re-arrange get_page_from_l<N>e() vs pv_l1tf_check_l<N>e()"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.