[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] console: avoid printing no or null time stamps
Hi Jan, On 26/06/18 08:24, Jan Beulich wrote: On most of the platforms, the timer will have been correctly enabled by the firmware. However, on a few platforms it may require additional setup that will be performed by platform_init_time().During early boot timestamps aren't very useful, as they're all zero (in "boot" mode) or absent altogether (in "date" and "datems" modes). Log "boot" format timestamps when the date formats aren't available yet, and log raw timestamps when boot ones are still all zero. Also add a "raw" mode. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- ARM side build-tested only; I'm in particular unsure whether READ_SYSREG64(CNTPCT_EL0) can indeed be used right at start of day. In any case, CNTCPT_EL0 can always be read but may return garbage on those few platforms. I would not worry too much for those platforms thoughts. --- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown +++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ only available when used together with ` makes sense on its own.### console\_timestamps-> `= none | date | datems | boot` +> `= none | date | datems | boot | raw`> Default: `none` @@ -428,6 +428,8 @@ Specify which timestamp format Xen shoul* `[YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS.mmm]` * `boot`: Seconds and microseconds since boot * `[SSSSSS.uuuuuu]` ++ `raw`: Raw platform ticks, architecture and implementation dependent + * `[XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX]`For compatibility with the older boolean parameter, specifying`console_timestamps` alone will enable the `date` option. --- a/xen/drivers/char/console.c +++ b/xen/drivers/char/console.c @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ enum con_timestamp_mode TSM_NONE, /* No timestamps */ TSM_DATE, /* [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS] */ TSM_DATE_MS, /* [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS.mmm] */ - TSM_BOOT /* [SSSSSS.uuuuuu] */ + TSM_BOOT, /* [SSSSSS.uuuuuu] */ + TSM_RAW, /* [XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX] */ };static enum con_timestamp_mode __read_mostly opt_con_timestamp_mode = TSM_NONE;@@ -676,6 +677,8 @@ static int parse_console_timestamps(cons opt_con_timestamp_mode = TSM_DATE_MS; else if ( !strcmp(s, "boot") ) opt_con_timestamp_mode = TSM_BOOT; + else if ( !strcmp(s, "raw") ) + opt_con_timestamp_mode = TSM_RAW; else if ( !strcmp(s, "none") ) opt_con_timestamp_mode = TSM_NONE; else @@ -698,26 +701,30 @@ static void printk_start_of_line(const c case TSM_DATE_MS: tm = wallclock_time(&nsec);- if ( tm.tm_mday == 0 )- return; - - if ( opt_con_timestamp_mode == TSM_DATE ) - snprintf(tstr, sizeof(tstr), "[%04u-%02u-%02u %02u:%02u:%02u] ", - 1900 + tm.tm_year, tm.tm_mon + 1, tm.tm_mday, - tm.tm_hour, tm.tm_min, tm.tm_sec); - else + if ( tm.tm_mday ) + { snprintf(tstr, sizeof(tstr), - "[%04u-%02u-%02u %02u:%02u:%02u.%03"PRIu64"] ", + opt_con_timestamp_mode == TSM_DATE + ? "[%04u-%02u-%02u %02u:%02u:%02u] " + : "[%04u-%02u-%02u %02u:%02u:%02u.%03"PRIu64"] ", 1900 + tm.tm_year, tm.tm_mon + 1, tm.tm_mday, tm.tm_hour, tm.tm_min, tm.tm_sec, nsec / 1000000); I find this change rather difficult to read because the number of arguments for the 2 formats are different. It would be better to keep the two snprintf separately. But I am fairly surprised the compiler is happy with such changes. - break; - + break; + } + /* fall through */ case TSM_BOOT: sec = NOW(); nsec = do_div(sec, 1000000000);- snprintf(tstr, sizeof(tstr), "[%5"PRIu64".%06"PRIu64"] ",- sec, nsec / 1000); + if ( sec | nsec ) + { + snprintf(tstr, sizeof(tstr), "[%5"PRIu64".%06"PRIu64"] ", + sec, nsec / 1000); + break; + } + /* fall through */ + case TSM_RAW: + snprintf(tstr, sizeof(tstr), "[%016"PRIx64"] ", get_cycles()); break;case TSM_NONE:--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/time.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/time.h @@ -5,11 +5,11 @@ DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE("arm,armv7-timer"), \ DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE("arm,armv8-timer")-typedef unsigned long cycles_t;+typedef uint64_t cycles_t; Please mention this change in the commit message. static inline cycles_t get_cycles (void){ - return 0; + return READ_SYSREG64(CNTPCT_EL0); }/* List of timer's IRQ */--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/time.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/time.h @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ extern bool disable_tsc_sync;static inline cycles_t get_cycles(void){ - return rdtsc(); + return rdtsc_ordered(); }unsigned long Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |