[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 08/15] x86/cpu: Remove loop form vmce_save_vcpu_ctxt() func
On Jo, 2018-06-21 at 01:39 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 20.06.18 at 10:56, <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So the final plan for the series is like this: > > - Base everything on Roger's series > > - Keep patches 1-7 > > - Have patch 8 add an extra arg to HVM_REGISTER_SAVE_RESTORE > > and hvm_sr_handlers > > - Have patch 9 like the patch 15 form now and have it call the > > save_one handlers > > - Have the next patches remove the redundant save handlers and > > rename the save one > > - The final patch should remove the extra arg. This one can be > > kept or not. > Sounds reasonable, albeit I have to admit I'm not sure what the last > sentence is supposed to mean. Either it is possible to eliminate the > extra arg, then you should do so, or it is not possible (in which > case > you can't possibly add a respective patch to the series). I wanted to say that the last patch will be independent and it can go upstream or not because you said that you are not sure if the extra args should be removed or not. Alex ________________________ This email was scanned by Bitdefender _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |