[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 8/9] xen/gntdev: Implement dma-buf export functionality
On 06/13/2018 05:58 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 06/12/2018 09:41 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> 1. Create a dma-buf from grant references provided by the foreign domain. By default dma-buf is backed by system memory pages, but by providing GNTDEV_DMA_FLAG_XXX flags it can also be created as a DMA write-combine/coherent buffer, e.g. allocated with corresponding dma_alloc_xxx API. Export the resulting buffer as a new dma-buf. 2. Implement waiting for the dma-buf to be released: block until the dma-buf with the file descriptor provided is released. If within the time-out provided the buffer is not released then -ETIMEDOUT error is returned. If the buffer with the file descriptor does not exist or has already been released, then -ENOENT is returned. For valid file descriptors this must not be treated as error. 3. Make gntdev's common code and structures available to dma-buf.Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>--- drivers/xen/gntdev-common.h | 4 + drivers/xen/gntdev-dmabuf.c | 470 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- drivers/xen/gntdev.c | 10 + 3 files changed, 482 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/gntdev-common.h b/drivers/xen/gntdev-common.h index a3408fd39b07..72f80dbce861 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/gntdev-common.h +++ b/drivers/xen/gntdev-common.h @@ -89,4 +89,8 @@ bool gntdev_account_mapped_pages(int count); int gntdev_map_grant_pages(struct gntdev_grant_map *map); +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV_DMABUF+void gntdev_remove_map(struct gntdev_priv *priv, struct gntdev_grant_map *map);+#endif + #endif diff --git a/drivers/xen/gntdev-dmabuf.c b/drivers/xen/gntdev-dmabuf.c index dc57c6a25525..84cba67c6ad7 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/gntdev-dmabuf.c +++ b/drivers/xen/gntdev-dmabuf.c @@ -3,13 +3,53 @@ /* * Xen dma-buf functionality for gntdev. * + * DMA buffer implementation is based on drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c. + * * Copyright (c) 2018 Oleksandr Andrushchenko, EPAM Systems Inc. */ +#include <linux/dma-buf.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <xen/grant_table.h> +#include <xen/gntdev.h> + +#include "gntdev-common.h" #include "gntdev-dmabuf.h" +struct gntdev_dmabuf { + struct gntdev_dmabuf_priv *priv; + struct dma_buf *dmabuf; + struct list_head next; + int fd; + + union { + struct { + /* Exported buffers are reference counted. */ + struct kref refcount; + + struct gntdev_priv *priv; + struct gntdev_grant_map *map; + } exp; + } u; + + /* Number of pages this buffer has. */ + int nr_pages; + /* Pages of this buffer. */ + struct page **pages; +}; + +struct gntdev_dmabuf_wait_obj { + struct list_head next; + struct gntdev_dmabuf *gntdev_dmabuf; + struct completion completion; +}; + +struct gntdev_dmabuf_attachment { + struct sg_table *sgt; + enum dma_data_direction dir; +}; + struct gntdev_dmabuf_priv { /* List of exported DMA buffers. */ struct list_head exp_list; @@ -23,17 +63,439 @@ struct gntdev_dmabuf_priv { /* Implementation of wait for exported DMA buffer to be released. */ +static void dmabuf_exp_release(struct kref *kref); + +static struct gntdev_dmabuf_wait_obj * +dmabuf_exp_wait_obj_new(struct gntdev_dmabuf_priv *priv, + struct gntdev_dmabuf *gntdev_dmabuf) +{ + struct gntdev_dmabuf_wait_obj *obj; + + obj = kzalloc(sizeof(*obj), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!obj) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + init_completion(&obj->completion); + obj->gntdev_dmabuf = gntdev_dmabuf; + + mutex_lock(&priv->lock); + list_add(&obj->next, &priv->exp_wait_list);+ /* Put our reference and wait for gntdev_dmabuf's release to fire. */+ kref_put(&gntdev_dmabuf->u.exp.refcount, dmabuf_exp_release); + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock); + return obj; +} + +static void dmabuf_exp_wait_obj_free(struct gntdev_dmabuf_priv *priv, + struct gntdev_dmabuf_wait_obj *obj) +{ + struct gntdev_dmabuf_wait_obj *cur_obj, *q; + + mutex_lock(&priv->lock); + list_for_each_entry_safe(cur_obj, q, &priv->exp_wait_list, next) + if (cur_obj == obj) { + list_del(&obj->next); + kfree(obj); + break; + } + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);Do we really need to walk the list? It can be deleted without walking the list and no reason to do that walk. Just an example of over-engineering here, thank you for spotting this. And if we do, do we need the safe variant of the walk? We are holding the lock. Here and elsewhere.You are perfectly right. I will not use safe variant of the walk, no need for that +} + +static int dmabuf_exp_wait_obj_wait(struct gntdev_dmabuf_wait_obj *obj, + u32 wait_to_ms) +{ + if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&obj->completion, + msecs_to_jiffies(wait_to_ms)) <= 0) + return -ETIMEDOUT; + + return 0; +} + +static void dmabuf_exp_wait_obj_signal(struct gntdev_dmabuf_priv *priv, + struct gntdev_dmabuf *gntdev_dmabuf) +{ + struct gntdev_dmabuf_wait_obj *obj, *q; + + list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, q, &priv->exp_wait_list, next) + if (obj->gntdev_dmabuf == gntdev_dmabuf) { + pr_debug("Found gntdev_dmabuf in the wait list, wake\n"); + complete_all(&obj->completion); + break; + } +} + +static struct gntdev_dmabuf * +dmabuf_exp_wait_obj_get_by_fd(struct gntdev_dmabuf_priv *priv, int fd)The name of this routine implies (to me) that we are getting a wait object but IIUIC we are getting a gntdev_dmabuf that we are going to later associate with a wait object. How about dmabuf_exp_wait_obj_get_dmabuf_by_fd? I would like to keep function prefixes, e.g. dmabuf_exp_wait_obj_ just to show to which functionality a routine belongs. +{ + struct gntdev_dmabuf *q, *gntdev_dmabuf, *ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); + + mutex_lock(&priv->lock); + list_for_each_entry_safe(gntdev_dmabuf, q, &priv->exp_list, next) + if (gntdev_dmabuf->fd == fd) { + pr_debug("Found gntdev_dmabuf in the wait list\n"); + kref_get(&gntdev_dmabuf->u.exp.refcount); + ret = gntdev_dmabuf; + break; + } + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock); + return ret; +} +int gntdev_dmabuf_exp_wait_released(struct gntdev_dmabuf_priv *priv, int fd,int wait_to_ms) { - return -EINVAL; + struct gntdev_dmabuf *gntdev_dmabuf; + struct gntdev_dmabuf_wait_obj *obj; + int ret; + + pr_debug("Will wait for dma-buf with fd %d\n", fd); + /* + * Try to find the DMA buffer: if not found means that + * either the buffer has already been released or file descriptor + * provided is wrong. + */ + gntdev_dmabuf = dmabuf_exp_wait_obj_get_by_fd(priv, fd); + if (IS_ERR(gntdev_dmabuf)) + return PTR_ERR(gntdev_dmabuf); + + /*+ * gntdev_dmabuf still exists and is reference count locked by us now, + * so prepare to wait: allocate wait object and add it to the wait list,+ * so we can find it on release. + */ + obj = dmabuf_exp_wait_obj_new(priv, gntdev_dmabuf); + if (IS_ERR(obj)) + return PTR_ERR(obj); + + ret = dmabuf_exp_wait_obj_wait(obj, wait_to_ms); + dmabuf_exp_wait_obj_free(priv, obj); + return ret; +} + +/* DMA buffer export support. */ + +static struct sg_table * +dmabuf_pages_to_sgt(struct page **pages, unsigned int nr_pages) +{ + struct sg_table *sgt; + int ret; + + sgt = kmalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!sgt) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto out; + } + + ret = sg_alloc_table_from_pages(sgt, pages, nr_pages, 0, + nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT, + GFP_KERNEL); + if (ret) + goto out; + + return sgt; + +out: + kfree(sgt); + return ERR_PTR(ret); +} + +static int dmabuf_exp_ops_attach(struct dma_buf *dma_buf, + struct device *target_dev, + struct dma_buf_attachment *attach) +{ + struct gntdev_dmabuf_attachment *gntdev_dmabuf_attach; + + gntdev_dmabuf_attach = kzalloc(sizeof(*gntdev_dmabuf_attach), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!gntdev_dmabuf_attach) + return -ENOMEM; + + gntdev_dmabuf_attach->dir = DMA_NONE; + attach->priv = gntdev_dmabuf_attach; + return 0; +} + +static void dmabuf_exp_ops_detach(struct dma_buf *dma_buf, + struct dma_buf_attachment *attach) +{+ struct gntdev_dmabuf_attachment *gntdev_dmabuf_attach = attach->priv;+ + if (gntdev_dmabuf_attach) { + struct sg_table *sgt = gntdev_dmabuf_attach->sgt; + + if (sgt) { + if (gntdev_dmabuf_attach->dir != DMA_NONE) + dma_unmap_sg_attrs(attach->dev, sgt->sgl, + sgt->nents, + gntdev_dmabuf_attach->dir, + DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC); + sg_free_table(sgt); + } + + kfree(sgt); + kfree(gntdev_dmabuf_attach); + attach->priv = NULL; + } +} + +static struct sg_table * +dmabuf_exp_ops_map_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach, + enum dma_data_direction dir) +{+ struct gntdev_dmabuf_attachment *gntdev_dmabuf_attach = attach->priv;+ struct gntdev_dmabuf *gntdev_dmabuf = attach->dmabuf->priv; + struct sg_table *sgt; + + pr_debug("Mapping %d pages for dev %p\n", gntdev_dmabuf->nr_pages, + attach->dev); + + if (dir == DMA_NONE || !gntdev_dmabuf_attach) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + /* Return the cached mapping when possible. */ + if (gntdev_dmabuf_attach->dir == dir) + return gntdev_dmabuf_attach->sgt; + + /*+ * Two mappings with different directions for the same attachment are+ * not allowed. + */ + if (gntdev_dmabuf_attach->dir != DMA_NONE) + return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY); + + sgt = dmabuf_pages_to_sgt(gntdev_dmabuf->pages, + gntdev_dmabuf->nr_pages); + if (!IS_ERR(sgt)) { + if (!dma_map_sg_attrs(attach->dev, sgt->sgl, sgt->nents, dir, + DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC)) { + sg_free_table(sgt); + kfree(sgt); + sgt = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + } else { + gntdev_dmabuf_attach->sgt = sgt; + gntdev_dmabuf_attach->dir = dir; + } + } + if (IS_ERR(sgt)) + pr_debug("Failed to map sg table for dev %p\n", attach->dev); + return sgt; +} ++static void dmabuf_exp_ops_unmap_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,+ struct sg_table *sgt, + enum dma_data_direction dir) +{+ /* Not implemented. The unmap is done at dmabuf_exp_ops_detach(). */+} + +static void dmabuf_exp_release(struct kref *kref) +{ + struct gntdev_dmabuf *gntdev_dmabuf = + container_of(kref, struct gntdev_dmabuf, u.exp.refcount); + + dmabuf_exp_wait_obj_signal(gntdev_dmabuf->priv, gntdev_dmabuf); + list_del(&gntdev_dmabuf->next); + kfree(gntdev_dmabuf); +} + +static void dmabuf_exp_ops_release(struct dma_buf *dma_buf) +{ + struct gntdev_dmabuf *gntdev_dmabuf = dma_buf->priv; + struct gntdev_dmabuf_priv *priv = gntdev_dmabuf->priv; ++ gntdev_remove_map(gntdev_dmabuf->u.exp.priv, gntdev_dmabuf->u.exp.map);+ mutex_lock(&priv->lock); + kref_put(&gntdev_dmabuf->u.exp.refcount, dmabuf_exp_release); + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock); +} + +static void *dmabuf_exp_ops_kmap_atomic(struct dma_buf *dma_buf, + unsigned long page_num) +{ + /* Not implemented. */ + return NULL; +} + +static void dmabuf_exp_ops_kunmap_atomic(struct dma_buf *dma_buf, + unsigned long page_num, void *addr) +{ + /* Not implemented. */ +} + +static void *dmabuf_exp_ops_kmap(struct dma_buf *dma_buf, + unsigned long page_num) +{ + /* Not implemented. */ + return NULL; +} + +static void dmabuf_exp_ops_kunmap(struct dma_buf *dma_buf, + unsigned long page_num, void *addr) +{ + /* Not implemented. */ +} + +static int dmabuf_exp_ops_mmap(struct dma_buf *dma_buf, + struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + /* Not implemented. */ + return 0; +} + +static const struct dma_buf_ops dmabuf_exp_ops = { + .attach = dmabuf_exp_ops_attach, + .detach = dmabuf_exp_ops_detach, + .map_dma_buf = dmabuf_exp_ops_map_dma_buf, + .unmap_dma_buf = dmabuf_exp_ops_unmap_dma_buf, + .release = dmabuf_exp_ops_release, + .map = dmabuf_exp_ops_kmap, + .map_atomic = dmabuf_exp_ops_kmap_atomic, + .unmap = dmabuf_exp_ops_kunmap, + .unmap_atomic = dmabuf_exp_ops_kunmap_atomic, + .mmap = dmabuf_exp_ops_mmap, +}; + +struct gntdev_dmabuf_export_args { + struct gntdev_priv *priv; + struct gntdev_grant_map *map; + struct gntdev_dmabuf_priv *dmabuf_priv; + struct device *dev; + int count; + struct page **pages; + u32 fd; +}; ++static int dmabuf_exp_from_pages(struct gntdev_dmabuf_export_args *args)+{ + DEFINE_DMA_BUF_EXPORT_INFO(exp_info); + struct gntdev_dmabuf *gntdev_dmabuf; + int ret = 0;Not necessary. Will remove =0; + + gntdev_dmabuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*gntdev_dmabuf), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!gntdev_dmabuf) + return -ENOMEM; + + kref_init(&gntdev_dmabuf->u.exp.refcount); + + gntdev_dmabuf->priv = args->dmabuf_priv; + gntdev_dmabuf->nr_pages = args->count; + gntdev_dmabuf->pages = args->pages; + gntdev_dmabuf->u.exp.priv = args->priv; + gntdev_dmabuf->u.exp.map = args->map; + + exp_info.exp_name = KBUILD_MODNAME; + if (args->dev->driver && args->dev->driver->owner) + exp_info.owner = args->dev->driver->owner; + else + exp_info.owner = THIS_MODULE; + exp_info.ops = &dmabuf_exp_ops; + exp_info.size = args->count << PAGE_SHIFT; + exp_info.flags = O_RDWR; + exp_info.priv = gntdev_dmabuf; + + gntdev_dmabuf->dmabuf = dma_buf_export(&exp_info); + if (IS_ERR(gntdev_dmabuf->dmabuf)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(gntdev_dmabuf->dmabuf); + gntdev_dmabuf->dmabuf = NULL; + goto fail; + } + + ret = dma_buf_fd(gntdev_dmabuf->dmabuf, O_CLOEXEC); + if (ret < 0) + goto fail; + + gntdev_dmabuf->fd = ret; + args->fd = ret; + + pr_debug("Exporting DMA buffer with fd %d\n", ret); + + mutex_lock(&args->dmabuf_priv->lock); + list_add(&gntdev_dmabuf->next, &args->dmabuf_priv->exp_list); + mutex_unlock(&args->dmabuf_priv->lock); + return 0; + +fail: + if (gntdev_dmabuf->dmabuf) + dma_buf_put(gntdev_dmabuf->dmabuf); + kfree(gntdev_dmabuf); + return ret; +} + +static struct gntdev_grant_map *+dmabuf_exp_alloc_backing_storage(struct gntdev_priv *priv, int dmabuf_flags,+ int count) +{ + struct gntdev_grant_map *map; + + if (unlikely(count <= 0)) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + if ((dmabuf_flags & GNTDEV_DMA_FLAG_WC) && + (dmabuf_flags & GNTDEV_DMA_FLAG_COHERENT)) {+ pr_debug("Wrong dma-buf flags: either WC or coherent, not both\n");Why not just print the value of the flags? Will print hex value of the flags + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + } + + map = gntdev_alloc_map(priv, count, dmabuf_flags); + if (!map) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + if (unlikely(gntdev_account_mapped_pages(count))) { + pr_debug("can't map: over limit\n");I think printing @count value here would be useful. Will add + gntdev_put_map(NULL, map); + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + } + return map; } int gntdev_dmabuf_exp_from_refs(struct gntdev_priv *priv, int flags, int count, u32 domid, u32 *refs, u32 *fd) { + struct gntdev_grant_map *map; + struct gntdev_dmabuf_export_args args; + int i, ret; + *fd = -1;Is this still needed? No, will remove. I was thinking here about if user-space ignores IOCTL return value and tries to use the fd so it fails on -1. But, ok, no reason to fix user-space bugs in the kernel Well, I wish I could, but the main difference when calling gntdev_put_map(priv, map)- return -EINVAL; + + map = dmabuf_exp_alloc_backing_storage(priv, flags, count); + if (IS_ERR(map)) + return PTR_ERR(map); + + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { + map->grants[i].domid = domid; + map->grants[i].ref = refs[i]; + } + + mutex_lock(&priv->lock); + gntdev_add_map(priv, map); + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock); + + map->flags |= GNTMAP_host_map; +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) + map->flags |= GNTMAP_device_map; +#endif + + ret = gntdev_map_grant_pages(map); + if (ret < 0) + goto out; + + args.priv = priv; + args.map = map; + args.dev = priv->dma_dev; + args.dmabuf_priv = priv->dmabuf_priv; + args.count = map->count; + args.pages = map->pages; + + ret = dmabuf_exp_from_pages(&args); + if (ret < 0) + goto out; + + *fd = args.fd; + return 0; + +out: + gntdev_remove_map(priv, map); + return ret; } /* DMA buffer import support. */ @@ -63,6 +525,10 @@ struct gntdev_dmabuf_priv *gntdev_dmabuf_init(void) if (!priv) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + mutex_init(&priv->lock); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->exp_list); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->exp_wait_list); + return priv; } diff --git a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c index e82660d81d7e..5f93cd534840 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c +++ b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c@@ -262,6 +262,16 @@ void gntdev_put_map(struct gntdev_priv *priv, struct gntdev_grant_map *map)gntdev_free_map(map); } +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV_DMABUF+void gntdev_remove_map(struct gntdev_priv *priv, struct gntdev_grant_map *map)+{ + mutex_lock(&priv->lock); + list_del(&map->next); + gntdev_put_map(NULL /* already removed */, map);Why not pass call gntdev_put_map(priv, map) and then not have this routine at all? with priv != NULL and my code is that: void gntdev_put_map(struct gntdev_priv *priv, struct gntdev_grant_map *map) { [...] if (populate_freeable_maps && priv) { ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ mutex_lock(&priv->lock); list_del(&map->next); mutex_unlock(&priv->lock); } [...] } and #define populate_freeable_maps use_ptemod ^^^^^^^^^^ which means the map will never be removed from the list in my case because use_ptemod == false for dma-buf. This is why I do that by hand, e.g. remove the item from the list and then pass NULL for priv. Also, I will remove gntdev_remove_map as I can now access priv->lock and gntdev_put_map directly form gntdev-dmabuf.c I really dislike the fact that we are taking a lock here that gntdev_put_map() takes as well, although not with NULL argument. (And yes, I see that gntdev_release() does it too.) This can be re-factored later I guess? -boris Thank you, Oleksandr + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock); +} +#endif +/* ------------------------------------------------------------------ */static int find_grant_ptes(pte_t *pte, pgtable_t token, _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |