|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/XPTI: fix S3 resume (and CPU offlining in general)
Andrew Cooper:
> On 24/05/18 15:14, Simon Gaiser wrote:
>> Jan Beulich:
>>>>>> On 24.05.18 at 16:00, <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Jan Beulich:
>>>>> In commit d1d6fc97d6 ("x86/xpti: really hide almost all of Xen image")
>>>>> I've failed to remember the fact that multiple CPUs share a stub
>>>>> mapping page. Therefore it is wrong to unconditionally zap the mapping
>>>>> when bringing down a CPU; it may only be unmapped when no other online
>>>>> CPU uses that same page.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reported-by: Simon Gaiser <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
>>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
>>>>> @@ -876,7 +876,21 @@ static void cleanup_cpu_root_pgt(unsigne
>>>>>
>>>>> free_xen_pagetable(rpt);
>>>>>
>>>>> - /* Also zap the stub mapping for this CPU. */
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Also zap the stub mapping for this CPU, if no other online one
>>>>> uses
>>>>> + * the same page.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if ( stub_linear )
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + unsigned int other;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + for_each_online_cpu(other)
>>>>> + if ( !((per_cpu(stubs.addr, other) ^ stub_linear) >>
>>>>> PAGE_SHIFT) )
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + stub_linear = 0;
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> if ( stub_linear )
>>>>> {
>>>>> l3_pgentry_t *l3t = l4e_to_l3e(common_pgt);
>>>> Tried this on-top of staging (fc5805daef) and I still get the same
>>>> double fault.
>>> Hmm, it worked for me offlining (and later re-onlining) several pCPU-s. What
>>> size a system are you testing on? Mine has got only 12 CPUs, i.e. all stubs
>>> are in the same page (and I'd never unmap anything here at all).
>> 4 cores + HT, so 8 CPUs from Xen's PoV.
>
> Can you try with the "x86/traps: Dump the instruction stream even for
> double faults" patch I've just posted, and show the full #DF panic log
> please? (Its conceivable that there are multiple different issues here.)
With Jan's and your patch:
(XEN) mce_intel.c:782: MCA Capability: firstbank 0, extended MCE MSR 0, BCAST,
CMCI
(XEN) CPU0 CMCI LVT vector (0xf2) already installed
(XEN) Finishing wakeup from ACPI S3 state.
(XEN) Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
(XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v1 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from
0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00000
(XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v1 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from
0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00800
(XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v2 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from
0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00000
(XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v2 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from
0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00800
(XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v3 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from
0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00000
(XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v3 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from
0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00800
(XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v4 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from
0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00000
(XEN) emul-priv-op.c:1166:d0v4 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000001b from
0x00000000fee00c00 to 0x00000000fee00800
(XEN) *** DOUBLE FAULT ***
(XEN) ----[ Xen-4.11-rc x86_64 debug=y Not tainted ]----
(XEN) CPU: 0
(XEN) RIP: e008:[<ffff82d08037b964>] handle_exception+0x9c/0xff
(XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000010006 CONTEXT: hypervisor
(XEN) rax: ffffc90040ce40d8 rbx: 0000000000000000 rcx: 0000000000000003
(XEN) rdx: 0000000000000000 rsi: 0000000000000000 rdi: 0000000000000000
(XEN) rbp: 000036ffbf31bf07 rsp: ffffc90040ce4000 r8: 0000000000000000
(XEN) r9: 0000000000000000 r10: 0000000000000000 r11: 0000000000000000
(XEN) r12: 0000000000000000 r13: 0000000000000000 r14: ffffc90040ce7fff
(XEN) r15: 0000000000000000 cr0: 000000008005003b cr4: 0000000000042660
(XEN) cr3: 000000022200a000 cr2: ffffc90040ce3ff8
(XEN) fsb: 00007fa9e7909740 gsb: ffff88021e740000 gss: 0000000000000000
(XEN) ds: 002b es: 002b fs: 0000 gs: 0000 ss: e010 cs: e008
(XEN) Xen code around <ffff82d08037b964> (handle_exception+0x9c/0xff):
(XEN) 00 f3 90 0f ae e8 eb f9 <e8> 07 00 00 00 f3 90 0f ae e8 eb f9 83 e9 01 75
(XEN) Current stack base ffffc90040ce0000 differs from expected ffff8300cec88000
(XEN) Valid stack range: ffffc90040ce6000-ffffc90040ce8000,
sp=ffffc90040ce4000, tss.rsp0=ffff8300cec8ffa0
(XEN) No stack overflow detected. Skipping stack trace.
(XEN)
(XEN) ****************************************
(XEN) Panic on CPU 0:
(XEN) DOUBLE FAULT -- system shutdown
(XEN) ****************************************
(XEN)
(XEN) Reboot in five seconds...
Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |