Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/p2m: fixed p2m_change_type_range() start / end check

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 18.04.18 at 12:23, <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That is, sensible input looks like:
> * start < end
> * For hostp2ms:
>  - start <= max_mapped_pfn
>  - either end <= max_mapped_pfn, or end == ~0UL
> (But for altp2ms, start or end > max_mapped_pfn is fine.)

So I guess that's part of the difficulty I'm having with the original 
suggestion:
Why would such input be okay for alternative p2m-s?

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel