Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10] x86/altp2m: support for setting restrictions for an array of pages

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 30.03.18 at 12:32, <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/30/2018 11:14 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>> On 03/30/2018 01:03 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> In response to v8, I said:  "FWIW the approach looks good to me here.
>>> You mainly need an x86 maintainer's ack and a toolstack maintainer's
>>> ack (of which I am neither)."
>>>
>>> I'm not a maintainer of `xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c` -- that's Andy and Jan.
>>>
>>> OTOH, altp2m is a p2m feature, so arguably it should be primarily my
>>> responsibility.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I'll take a look at it today; if I can give a Reviewed-by, then
>>> maybe we can negotiate for it to go in with just that (with my committer
>>> hat on on), or for Andy to Ack it based mostly on my R-b.
>> 
>> Thank you for your help! And sorry if I've mistakenly named you here,
>> quite possibly I've misunderstood Jan's earlier reply.
> 
> No, you were clearly taking a lead from Jan -- I'm not sure exactly what
> he had in mind by naming me (i.e., with the strict rules for who has to
> approve what).  I was just explaining why it didn't already have an R-b
> from me. :-)

Well, I had you in mind with the topic (altp2m) in mind, alongside
the strict file based rules which would limit acks to Andrew and me.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel