Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 12/39] ARM: new VGIC: Add IRQ sorting

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Adds the sorting function to cover the case where you have more IRQs
> to consider than you have LRs. We consider their priorities.
> This uses the new sort_list() implementation imported from Linux.
> 
> This is based on Linux commit 8e4447457965, written by Christoffer Dall.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 59 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> index f7dfd01c1d..ee0de8d2e0 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>   * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>   */
>  
> +#include <xen/list_sort.h>
>  #include <xen/sched.h>
>  #include <asm/bug.h>
>  #include <asm/event.h>
> @@ -193,6 +194,64 @@ static struct vcpu *vgic_target_oracle(struct vgic_irq 
> *irq)
>      return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * The order of items in the ap_lists defines how we'll pack things in LRs as
> + * well, the first items in the list being the first things populated in the
> + * LRs.
> + *
> + * A hard rule is that active interrupts can never be pushed out of the LRs
> + * (and therefore take priority) since we cannot reliably trap on 
> deactivation
> + * of IRQs and therefore they have to be present in the LRs.
> + *
> + * Otherwise things should be sorted by the priority field and the GIC
> + * hardware support will take care of preemption of priority groups etc.
> + *
> + * Return negative if "a" sorts before "b", 0 to preserve order, and positive
> + * to sort "b" before "a".
> + */
> +static int vgic_irq_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b)
> +{
> +    struct vgic_irq *irqa = container_of(a, struct vgic_irq, ap_list);
> +    struct vgic_irq *irqb = container_of(b, struct vgic_irq, ap_list);
> +    bool penda, pendb;
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    spin_lock(&irqa->irq_lock);
> +    spin_lock(&irqb->irq_lock);
> +
> +    if ( irqa->active || irqb->active )
> +    {
> +        ret = (int)irqb->active - (int)irqa->active;
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +
> +    penda = irqa->enabled && irq_is_pending(irqa);
> +    pendb = irqb->enabled && irq_is_pending(irqb);
> +
> +    if ( !penda || !pendb )
> +    {
> +        ret = (int)pendb - (int)penda;
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Both pending and enabled, sort by priority */
> +    ret = irqa->priority - irqb->priority;
> +out:
> +    spin_unlock(&irqb->irq_lock);
> +    spin_unlock(&irqa->irq_lock);
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* Must be called with the ap_list_lock held */
> +static void vgic_sort_ap_list(struct vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +    struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic;
> +
> +    ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock));
> +
> +    list_sort(NULL, &vgic_cpu->ap_list_head, vgic_irq_cmp);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Only valid injection if changing level for level-triggered IRQs or for a
>   * rising edge.
> -- 
> 2.14.1
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel