|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86: use invpcid to do global flushing
On 12/03/18 13:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> 03/09/18 7:05 PM >>>
>> On 09/03/18 16:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 05.03.18 at 10:50, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> @@ -120,11 +121,24 @@ unsigned int flush_area_local(const void *va,
>>>> unsigned int flags)
>>>> else
>>>> {
>>>> u32 t = pre_flush();
>>>> - unsigned long cr4 = read_cr4();
>>>>
>>>> - write_cr4(cr4 & ~X86_CR4_PGE);
>>>> - barrier();
>>>> - write_cr4(cr4);
>>>> + if ( !cpu_has_invpcid )
>>>> + {
>>>> + unsigned long cr4 = read_cr4();
>>>> +
>>>> + write_cr4(cr4 & ~X86_CR4_PGE);
>>>> + barrier();
>>>> + write_cr4(cr4);
>>>> + }
>>>> + else
>>>> + {
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Using invpcid to flush all mappings works
>>>> + * regardless of whether PCID is enabled or not.
>>>> + * It is faster than read-modify-write CR4.
>>>> + */
>>>> + invpcid_flush_all();
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> As just validly indicated by Jürgen, this is where my comment I
>>> gave to one of his patches actually belongs: This is correct for
>>> FLUSH_TLB_GLOBAL, but goes too far for FLUSH_TLB.
>>
>> And again it was so even before this patch.
>
> Not exactly - "before this patch" should include the state things were in
> before
> 32-bit code got removed. And that's where we had a proper separation between
> flushes including and excluding global entries. And now that we regain that
> ability, we should leverage it.
Already working on it in my XPTI speed-up series.
BTW: are you already working on rebasing your XPTI speed up series to
current staging? I'd like my series to use your series as a base unless
you are telling me you won't be able to resend your series soon.
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |