Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 00/11] xen: xen-domid-restrict improvements

[Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

For reasons I still don't quite understand, this cover letter was not
sent to the whole CC list so I am doing that by hand now.

Ian Jackson writes ("[PATCH v6 00/11] xen: xen-domid-restrict improvements"):
> This series provides necessary support for running qemu as a Xen
> device model without power equivalent to root.  In particular, it
> makes -xen-domid-restrict effective.
> 
> I have taken into account all the comments from v5 (from October!) and
> there are also two new patches from Ross Lagerwall.
> 
>   m  a [PATCH 01/11] xen: link against xentoolcore
>      a [PATCH 02/11] xen: restrict: use xentoolcore_restrict_all
>     r  [PATCH 03/11] xen: defer call to xen_restrict until just before
>      a [PATCH 04/11] xen: destroy_hvm_domain: Move reason into a variable
>     ra [PATCH 05/11] xen: move xc_interface compatibility fallback further
>   * r  [PATCH 06/11] xen: destroy_hvm_domain: Try xendevicemodel_shutdown
>   * r  [PATCH 07/11] os-posix: Provide new -runas <uid>:<gid> facility
>   m    [PATCH 08/11] configure: do_compiler: Dump some extra info under bash
>   +    [PATCH 09/11] xen: Use newly added dmops for mapping VGA memory
>   +    [PATCH 10/11] xen: Expect xenstore write to fail when restricted
>   +    [PATCH 11/11] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: Print proper error message
> 
>  m = commit message (only) changed in v6 of the series
>  * = patch changed in v6 of the series
>  + = new patch
>  r = reviewed (by someone other than me)
>  a = acked
> 
> Thanks for your attention.
> 
> Regards,
> Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel