Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen/domain: Reduce the quantity of initialisation for system domains

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/28/2018 02:14 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>  * System domains don't need watchdog initialisation or iomem/irq rangesets,
>    and will not plausibly be a xenstore or hardware domain.
>  * The idle domain doesn't need scheduler initialisation (and in particular,
>    removing this path allows for substantial scheduler cleanup), and isn't
>    liable to ever need late_hwdom_init().
> 
> Move all of these initialisations pass the DOMCRF_dummy early exit, and into
> non-idle paths.  rangeset_domain_initialise() remains because it makes no
> allocations, but does initialise a linked list and spinlock.  The poolid
> parameter can be dropped as sched_init_domain()'s parameter is now
> unconditionally 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good:

Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel