|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 12/17] xen/arm: vpsci: Remove parameter 'ver' from do_common_cpu
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Julien Grall wrote:
> Currently, the behavior of do_common_cpu will slightly change depending
> on the PSCI version passed in parameter. Looking at the code, more the
> specific 0.2 behavior could move out of the function or adapted for 0.1:
>
> - x0/r0 can be updated on PSCI 0.1 because general purpose registers
> are undefined upon CPU on.
> - PSCI 0.1 does not defined PSCI_ALREADY_ON. However, it would be
> safer to bail out if the CPU is already on.
>
> Based on this, the parameter 'ver' is removed and do_psci_cpu_on
> (implementation for PSCI 0.1) is adapted to avoid returning
> PSCI_ALREADY_ON.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr.babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> The reviewed-by was kept despite move this patch towards the end
> of the series because there was no clash with the rest of the series.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Move the patch towards the end of the series as not strictly
> necessary for SP2.
> - Add Volodymyr's reviewed-by
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c
> index 19ee7caeb4..7ea3ea58e3 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> #include <public/sched.h>
>
> static int do_common_cpu_on(register_t target_cpu, register_t entry_point,
> - register_t context_id,int ver)
> + register_t context_id)
> {
> struct vcpu *v;
> struct domain *d = current->domain;
> @@ -40,8 +40,7 @@ static int do_common_cpu_on(register_t target_cpu,
> register_t entry_point,
> if ( is_64bit_domain(d) && is_thumb )
> return PSCI_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>
> - if ( (ver == PSCI_VERSION(0, 2)) &&
> - !test_bit(_VPF_down, &v->pause_flags) )
> + if ( !test_bit(_VPF_down, &v->pause_flags) )
> return PSCI_ALREADY_ON;
>
> if ( (ctxt = alloc_vcpu_guest_context()) == NULL )
> @@ -55,18 +54,21 @@ static int do_common_cpu_on(register_t target_cpu,
> register_t entry_point,
> ctxt->ttbr0 = 0;
> ctxt->ttbr1 = 0;
> ctxt->ttbcr = 0; /* Defined Reset Value */
> +
> + /*
> + * x0/r0_usr are always updated because for PSCI 0.1 the general
> + * purpose registers are undefined upon CPU_on.
> + */
> if ( is_32bit_domain(d) )
> {
> ctxt->user_regs.cpsr = PSR_GUEST32_INIT;
> - if ( ver == PSCI_VERSION(0, 2) )
> - ctxt->user_regs.r0_usr = context_id;
> + ctxt->user_regs.r0_usr = context_id;
> }
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
> else
> {
> ctxt->user_regs.cpsr = PSR_GUEST64_INIT;
> - if ( ver == PSCI_VERSION(0, 2) )
> - ctxt->user_regs.x0 = context_id;
> + ctxt->user_regs.x0 = context_id;
> }
> #endif
>
> @@ -93,7 +95,14 @@ static int do_common_cpu_on(register_t target_cpu,
> register_t entry_point,
>
> static int32_t do_psci_cpu_on(uint32_t vcpuid, register_t entry_point)
> {
> - return do_common_cpu_on(vcpuid, entry_point, 0 , PSCI_VERSION(0, 1));
> + int32_t ret;
> +
> + ret = do_common_cpu_on(vcpuid, entry_point, 0);
> + /*
> + * PSCI 0.1 does not define the return code PSCI_ALREADY_ON.
> + * Instead, return PSCI_INVALID_PARAMETERS.
> + */
> + return (ret == PSCI_ALREADY_ON) ? PSCI_INVALID_PARAMETERS : ret;
> }
>
> static int32_t do_psci_cpu_off(uint32_t power_state)
> @@ -137,8 +146,7 @@ static int32_t do_psci_0_2_cpu_on(register_t target_cpu,
> register_t entry_point,
> register_t context_id)
> {
> - return do_common_cpu_on(target_cpu, entry_point, context_id,
> - PSCI_VERSION(0, 2));
> + return do_common_cpu_on(target_cpu, entry_point, context_id);
> }
>
> static const unsigned long target_affinity_mask[] = {
> --
> 2.11.0
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |