[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: cpuerrata: Actually check errata on non-boot CPUs



On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Julien Grall wrote:
> The cpu errata framework was introduced in commit 8b01f6364f "xen/arm:
> Detect silicon revision and set cap bits accordingly" and was meant to
> detect errata present on any CPUs (via check_local_cpu_errata). However,
> the function to check the MIDR (is_affected_midr_range) mistakenly
> always use the boot CPU MIDR.
> 
> Fix is_affected_midr_range to use the current CPU MIDR.
> 
> Reported-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>


> ---
>     This should be backported up to Xen 4.7 as the cpu errata framework
>     was backported for XSA-254.
> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/cpuerrata.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/cpuerrata.c b/xen/arch/arm/cpuerrata.c
> index 9c7458ef06..c243521ed4 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/cpuerrata.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/cpuerrata.c
> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static int enable_ic_inv_hardening(void *data)
>  static bool __maybe_unused
>  is_affected_midr_range(const struct arm_cpu_capabilities *entry)
>  {
> -    return MIDR_IS_CPU_MODEL_RANGE(boot_cpu_data.midr.bits, 
> entry->midr_model,
> +    return MIDR_IS_CPU_MODEL_RANGE(current_cpu_data.midr.bits, 
> entry->midr_model,
>                                     entry->midr_range_min,
>                                     entry->midr_range_max);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.