[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/hvm: fix domain crash when CR3 has the noflush bit set
>>> On 26.01.18 at 10:39, <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -2324,6 +2324,9 @@ int hvm_set_cr3(unsigned long value, bool_t may_defer) > } > } > > + if ( hvm_pcid_enabled(v) ) /* Clear the noflush bit. */ > + value &= ((1ull << 63) - 1); This needs a proper X86_CR3_* constant defined. Did you investigate what it would take to actually _act_ upon the bit being set (besides clearing it for the value to be stored to be sane)? Afaict it would require handing a boolean through paging_update_cr3() -> ... -> {svm,vmx}_update_guest_cr() to allow suppressing the hvm_asid_flush_vcpu() etc there. > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/monitor.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/monitor.c > @@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ bool hvm_monitor_cr(unsigned int index, unsigned long > value, unsigned long old) > struct arch_domain *ad = &curr->domain->arch; > unsigned int ctrlreg_bitmask = monitor_ctrlreg_bitmask(index); > > + if ( index == 3 && hvm_pcid_enabled(curr) ) /* Clear the noflush bit. */ > + { > + value &= ((1ull << 63) - 1); > + old &= ((1ull << 63) - 1); Why would "old" need clearing the bit? It being set during write doesn't actually get stored into the register, aiui. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |