[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/6] x86/hvm: Provide XEN_DMOP_add_to_physmap



On 01/18/2018 09:24 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.01.18 at 13:45, <ross.lagerwall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dm.c
@@ -640,6 +640,42 @@ static int dm_op(const struct dmop_args *op_args)
          break;
      }
+ case XEN_DMOP_add_to_physmap:
+    {
+        struct xen_dm_op_add_to_physmap *data =
+            &op.u.add_to_physmap;
+        struct xen_add_to_physmap xatp = {
+            .domid = op_args->domid,
+            .size = data->size,
+            .space = XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_range,
+            .idx = data->src_gfn,
+            .gpfn = data->dst_gfn,
+        };
+
+        if ( data->pad )
+        {
+            rc = -EINVAL;
+            break;
+        }
+
+        if ( xatp.size != data->size )
+        {
+            rc = -EOVERFLOW;
+            break;

I guess this is fine for now, but clearly not really necessary, as the
continuation logic could take care of the situation. Please add a
comment to this effect.

Oh, I didn't think of using the continuation logic for that. I'll use it then.


--- a/xen/include/public/hvm/dm_op.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/hvm/dm_op.h
@@ -368,6 +368,24 @@ struct xen_dm_op_remote_shutdown {
                             /* (Other reason values are not blocked) */
  };
+/*
+ * XEN_DMOP_add_to_physmap : Sets the GFNs at which a page range appears in
+ *                           the specified guest's address space. Identical to
+ *                           XENMEM_add_to_physmap with
+ *                           space == XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_range.
+ */
+#define XEN_DMOP_add_to_physmap 17
+
+struct xen_dm_op_add_to_physmap {
+    /* Number of GFNs to process. */
+    uint32_t size;
+    uint32_t pad;
+    /* Starting GFN of the source mapping page(s). */
+    uint64_aligned_t src_gfn;
+    /* Starting GFN where the source mapping page(s) should appear. */
+    uint64_aligned_t dst_gfn;
+};

So why again is this "add-to-physmap"? It's moving memory around,
isn't it? The comment also could be more clear in this regard.
Everything else looks fine to me now.


Do you have a preference for what to call it?

--
Ross Lagerwall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.