[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 10/17] x86/hvm: Permit guests direct access to MSR_{SPEC_CTRL, PRED_CMD}
For performance reasons, HVM guests should have direct access to these MSRs when possible. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> --- v7: * Drop excess brackets --- xen/arch/x86/domctl.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c | 5 +++++ xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ xen/arch/x86/msr.c | 3 ++- xen/include/asm-x86/msr.h | 5 ++++- 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c index 72b4489..e5fdde7 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ static int update_domain_cpuid_info(struct domain *d, struct cpuid_policy *p = d->arch.cpuid; const struct cpuid_leaf leaf = { ctl->eax, ctl->ebx, ctl->ecx, ctl->edx }; int old_vendor = p->x86_vendor; + unsigned int old_7d0 = p->feat.raw[0].d, old_e8b = p->extd.raw[8].b; bool call_policy_changed = false; /* Avoid for_each_vcpu() unnecessarily */ /* @@ -218,6 +219,14 @@ static int update_domain_cpuid_info(struct domain *d, d->arch.pv_domain.cpuidmasks->_7ab0 = mask; } + + /* + * If the IBSRB/STIBP policy has changed, we need to recalculate the + * MSR interception bitmaps and STIBP protection default. + */ + call_policy_changed = ((old_7d0 ^ p->feat.raw[0].d) & + (cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_IBRSB) | + cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_STIBP))); break; case 0xa: @@ -292,6 +301,16 @@ static int update_domain_cpuid_info(struct domain *d, d->arch.pv_domain.cpuidmasks->e1cd = mask; } break; + + case 0x80000008: + /* + * If the IBRB policy has changed, we need to recalculate the MSR + * interception bitmaps. + */ + call_policy_changed = (is_hvm_domain(d) && + ((old_e8b ^ p->extd.raw[8].b) & + cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_IBPB))); + break; } if ( call_policy_changed ) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c index c48fdfa..ee47508 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c @@ -617,6 +617,7 @@ static void svm_cpuid_policy_changed(struct vcpu *v) { struct arch_svm_struct *arch_svm = &v->arch.hvm_svm; struct vmcb_struct *vmcb = arch_svm->vmcb; + const struct cpuid_policy *cp = v->domain->arch.cpuid; u32 bitmap = vmcb_get_exception_intercepts(vmcb); if ( opt_hvm_fep || @@ -626,6 +627,10 @@ static void svm_cpuid_policy_changed(struct vcpu *v) bitmap &= ~(1U << TRAP_invalid_op); vmcb_set_exception_intercepts(vmcb, bitmap); + + /* Give access to MSR_PRED_CMD if the guest has been told about it. */ + svm_intercept_msr(v, MSR_PRED_CMD, + cp->extd.ibpb ? MSR_INTERCEPT_NONE : MSR_INTERCEPT_RW); } static void svm_sync_vmcb(struct vcpu *v) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c index e036303..8609de3 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -656,6 +656,8 @@ void vmx_update_exception_bitmap(struct vcpu *v) static void vmx_cpuid_policy_changed(struct vcpu *v) { + const struct cpuid_policy *cp = v->domain->arch.cpuid; + if ( opt_hvm_fep || (v->domain->arch.cpuid->x86_vendor != boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) ) v->arch.hvm_vmx.exception_bitmap |= (1U << TRAP_invalid_op); @@ -665,6 +667,22 @@ static void vmx_cpuid_policy_changed(struct vcpu *v) vmx_vmcs_enter(v); vmx_update_exception_bitmap(v); vmx_vmcs_exit(v); + + /* + * We can only pass though MSR_SPEC_CTRL if the guest knows about all bits + * in it. Otherwise, Xen may be fixing up in the background. + */ + v->arch.msr->spec_ctrl.direct_access = cp->feat.ibrsb && cp->feat.stibp; + if ( v->arch.msr->spec_ctrl.direct_access ) + vmx_clear_msr_intercept(v, MSR_SPEC_CTRL, VMX_MSR_RW); + else + vmx_set_msr_intercept(v, MSR_SPEC_CTRL, VMX_MSR_RW); + + /* MSR_PRED_CMD is safe to pass through if the guest knows about it. */ + if ( cp->feat.ibrsb || cp->extd.ibpb ) + vmx_clear_msr_intercept(v, MSR_PRED_CMD, VMX_MSR_RW); + else + vmx_set_msr_intercept(v, MSR_PRED_CMD, VMX_MSR_RW); } int vmx_guest_x86_mode(struct vcpu *v) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/msr.c b/xen/arch/x86/msr.c index 02a7b49..697cc6e 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/msr.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msr.c @@ -132,7 +132,8 @@ int guest_rdmsr(const struct vcpu *v, uint32_t msr, uint64_t *val) case MSR_SPEC_CTRL: if ( !cp->feat.ibrsb ) goto gp_fault; - *val = vp->spec_ctrl.guest; + *val = (vp->spec_ctrl.direct_access + ? vp->spec_ctrl.host : vp->spec_ctrl.guest); break; case MSR_INTEL_PLATFORM_INFO: diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/msr.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/msr.h index 3d0012d..007e966 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/msr.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/msr.h @@ -229,10 +229,13 @@ struct msr_vcpu_policy * Only the bottom two bits are defined, so no need to waste space * with uint64_t at the moment. We maintain the guests idea of the * value it wrote, and a value to install into hardware (extended to - * uint32_t to simplify the asm) which might be different. + * uint32_t to simplify the asm) which might be different. HVM guests + * might be given direct access to the MSRs, at which point the + * 'guest' value becomes stale. */ uint32_t host; uint8_t guest; + bool direct_access; } spec_ctrl; /* 0x00000140 MSR_INTEL_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES */ -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |