[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v1 57/74] x86/pv-shim: shadow PV console's page for L2 DomU
>>> On 09.01.18 at 16:43, <sergey.dyasli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 02:13 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > > > On 04.01.18 at 14:06, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > +size_t consoled_guest_rx(void) >> > +{ >> > + size_t recv = 0, idx = 0; >> > + XENCONS_RING_IDX cons, prod; >> > + >> > + if ( !cons_ring ) >> > + return 0; >> > + >> > + spin_lock(&rx_lock); >> > + >> > + cons = cons_ring->out_cons; >> > + prod = ACCESS_ONCE(cons_ring->out_prod); >> > + ASSERT((prod - cons) <= sizeof(cons_ring->out)); >> > + >> > + /* Is the ring empty? */ >> > + if ( cons == prod ) >> > + goto out; >> > + >> > + /* Update pointers before accessing the ring */ >> > + smp_rmb(); >> >> I think this need to move up ahead of the if(). In the comment >> perhaps s/Update/Latch/? > > The read/write memory barriers here are between read/write accesses to > ring->out_prod and ring->out array. So there is no need to move them. > (the same goes for the input ring) And there is no multiple-read issue here? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |