[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86: xen: remove the use of VLAIS
On 01/08/2018 11:28 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 08/01/18 17:20, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 01/08/2018 11:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 01:39:48PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >>>> Variable Length Arrays In Structs (VLAIS) is not supported by Clang, and >>>> frowned upon by others. >>>> >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/23/500 >>>> >>>> Here, the VLAIS was used because the size of the bitmap returned from >>>> xen_mc_entry() depended on possibly (based on kernel configuration) >>>> runtime sized data. Rather than declaring args as a VLAIS then calling >>>> sizeof on *args, we calculate the appropriate sizeof args manually. >>>> Further, we can get rid of the #ifdef's and rely on num_possible_cpus() >>>> (thanks to a helpful checkpatch warning from an earlier version of this >>>> patch). >>>> >>>> Suggested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> Changes in v2: >>>> * Change mask to us DECLARE_BITMAP instead of pointer, as suggested. >>>> * Update commit message to remove mention of pointer. >>>> * Update sizeof calculation to work with array rather than pointer. >>>> >>>> arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c | 8 +++----- >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c >>>> index 4d62c07..d850762 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c >>>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c >>>> @@ -1325,20 +1325,18 @@ static void xen_flush_tlb_others(const struct >>>> cpumask *cpus, >>>> { >>>> struct { >>>> struct mmuext_op op; >>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP >>>> - DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, num_processors); >>>> -#else >>>> DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, NR_CPUS); >>>> -#endif >>>> } *args; >>> Why is it OK for Xen to place this bitmap on-stack in the first place? >>> That NR_CPUS thing can be fairly huge. >> Err... right. Now it's even worse than it was before, when the array was >> potentially smaller. I'll drop this. > No, its only the pointer to the struct, not the struct itself. > It's the full array, isn't it? #define DECLARE_BITMAP(name,bits) \ unsigned long name[BITS_TO_LONGS(bits)] <pause> OK, it *is* a pointer. Sigh... -boris _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |