| 
    
 [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86-64/Xen: eliminate W+X mappings
 
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> On 12.12.17 at 11:38, <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > * Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> --- 4.15-rc3/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
> >> +++ 4.15-rc3-x86_64-Xen-avoid-W+X/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
> >> @@ -1902,6 +1902,16 @@ void __init xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(p
> >>    /* Graft it onto L4[511][510] */
> >>    copy_page(level2_kernel_pgt, l2);
> >>  
> >> +  /* Zap execute permission from the ident map. Due to the sharing of
> >> +   * L1 entries we need to do this in the L2. */
> > 
> > please use the customary (multi-line) comment style:
> > 
> >   /*
> >    * Comment .....
> >    * ...... goes here.
> >    */
> > 
> > specified in Documentation/CodingStyle.
> 
> I would have but didn't because all other comments in this function
> use this (wrong) style. I've concluded that consistency is better
> here than matching the style doc. If the Xen maintainers tell me
> otherwise, I'll happily adjust the patch.
Then it should be cleaned up in a separate patch. The file is in arch/x86/ and 
both Documentation/CodingStyle and Linus's position is pretty unambiguous on 
this, 
there's no special exceptions for ugliness in arch/x86/ as far as I'm concerned.
Please guys fix this mess, NAK otherwise.
Thanks,
        Ingo
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
 
  | 
  
![]()  | 
            
         Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our  |