[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/privcmd: Support correctly 64KB page granularity when mapping memory



Hi Boris,

On 01/06/17 16:16, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 06/01/2017 10:01 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Boris,

On 01/06/17 14:33, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 06/01/2017 08:50 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Boris,

On 31/05/17 14:54, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 05/31/2017 09:03 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
Commit 5995a68 "xen/privcmd: Add support for Linux 64KB page
granularity" did
not go far enough to support 64KB in mmap_batch_fn.

The variable 'nr' is the number of 4KB chunk to map. However, when
Linux
is using 64KB page granularity the array of pages
(vma->vm_private_data)
contain one page per 64KB. Fix it by incrementing st->index
correctly.

Furthermore, st->va is not correctly incremented as PAGE_SIZE !=
XEN_PAGE_SIZE.

Fixes: 5995a68 ("xen/privcmd: Add support for Linux 64KB page
granularity")
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: Feng Kan <fkan@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/xen/privcmd.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
index 7a92a5e1d40c..feca75b07fdd 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ static int mmap_batch_fn(void *data, int nr,
void *state)
                 st->global_error = 1;
         }
     }
-    st->va += PAGE_SIZE * nr;
-    st->index += nr;
+    st->va += XEN_PAGE_SIZE * nr;
+    st->index += nr / XEN_PFN_PER_PAGE;

     return 0;
 }


Are we still using PAGE_MASK for xen_remap_domain_gfn_array()?

Do you mean in the xen_xlate_remap_gfn_array implementation? If so
there are no use of PAGE_MASK as the code has been converted to
support 64K page granularity.

If you mean the x86 version of xen_remap_domain_gfn_array, then we
don't really care as x86 only use 4KB page granularity.


I meant right above the change that you made. Should it also be replaced
with XEN_PAGE_MASK? (Sorry for being unclear.)

Oh. The code in xen_remap_domain_gfn_array is relying on st->va to be
page aligned. So I think we want to keep PAGE_MASK here.

Doe this imply then that 'nr' 4K pages is integral number of PAGE_SIZE
(i.e. (nr*XEN_PAGE_SIZE) % PAGE_SIZE == 0) and if yes --- do we test
this somewhere? I don't see it.

nr might be smaller for the last batch. But all the intermediate batch should have ((nr * XEN_PAGE_SIZE) % PAGE_SIZE == 0).

I think the BUILD_BUG_ON in privcmd_ioctl_mmap_batch ensure that all the intermediate batch will always be an integral number of PAGE_SIZE.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.