|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4] x86/ioreq_server: Make p2m_finish_type_change actually work
>>> On 12.05.17 at 04:42, <xiong.y.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Commit 6d774a951696 ("x86/ioreq server: synchronously reset outstanding
> p2m_ioreq_server entries when an ioreq server unmaps") introduced
> p2m_finish_type_change(), which was meant to synchronously finish a
> previously initiated type change over a gpfn range. It did this by
> calling get_entry(), checking if it was the appropriate type, and then
> calling set_entry().
>
> Unfortunately, a previous commit (1679e0df3df6 "x86/ioreq server:
> asynchronously reset outstanding p2m_ioreq_server entries") modified
> get_entry() to always return the new type after the type change, meaning
> that p2m_finish_type_change() never changed any entries. Which means
> when an ioreq server was detached and then re-attached (as happens in
> XenGT on reboot) the re-attach failed.
>
> Fix this by using the existing p2m-specific recalculation logic instead
> of doing a read-check-write loop.
>
> Fix: 'commit 6d774a951696 ("x86/ioreq server: synchronously reset
> outstanding p2m_ioreq_server entries when an ioreq server unmaps")'
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
albeit I'm not overly happy with ...
> +int p2m_finish_type_change(struct domain *d,
> + gfn_t first_gfn, unsigned long max_nr)
> {
> struct p2m_domain *p2m = p2m_get_hostp2m(d);
> - p2m_type_t t;
> unsigned long gfn = gfn_x(first_gfn);
> unsigned long last_gfn = gfn + max_nr - 1;
> -
> - ASSERT(ot != nt);
> - ASSERT(p2m_is_changeable(ot) && p2m_is_changeable(nt));
> + int rc = 0;
>
> p2m_lock(p2m);
>
> last_gfn = min(last_gfn, p2m->max_mapped_pfn);
> while ( gfn <= last_gfn )
> {
> - get_gfn_query_unlocked(d, gfn, &t);
> -
> - if ( t == ot )
> - p2m_change_type_one(d, gfn, t, nt);
> + rc = p2m->recalc(p2m, gfn);
> + /*
> + * ept->recalc could return 0/1/-ENOMEM. pt->recalc could return
> + * 0/-ENOMEM/-ENOENT, -ENOENT isn't an error as we are looping
> + * gfn here.
> + */
> + if ( rc == -ENOENT)
> + rc = 0;
> + else if ( rc < 0 )
> + {
> + gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "p2m->recalc failed! Dom%d gfn=%lx\n",
> + d->domain_id, gfn);
... a message being logged here.
Also I'm sure it was pointed out before that if this is meant for
4.9 (which I assume it is) you should have Cc-ed Julien (now
added).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |