|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] differing opinions between maintainers vs patch acks
>>> On 04.05.17 at 11:21, <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("differing opinions between maintainers vs patch acks"):
>> When there's an odd number of maintainers for a given piece of
>> code, it may be acceptable to pull in a 3rd maintainer to break ties,
>> but pulling in a non-maintainer (e.g. some [other] committer) to
>> help out seems not really appropriate to me.
>
> I'm afraid I disagree. Someone with a fresh perspective is often
> helpful, even if it involves a bit more explanation.
>
> And, the use of committers as referees in inter-maintainer disputes is
> explicitly laid out in the project governance document:
> https://xenproject.org/governance.html#roles-local
> | Committers
> ...
> | committers can also act as referees should disagreements amongst
> | maintainers arise
I understand this, and I agree as far as actual technical issues
go. I just don't think this is suitable / appropriate when it comes
to cosmetic questions.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |