|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 11/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement cos finding flow.
>>> On 01.04.17 at 15:53, <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> @@ -720,8 +720,83 @@ static int find_cos(const uint32_t val[], unsigned int
> array_len,
> const struct psr_socket_info *info,
> spinlock_t *ref_lock)
> {
> + unsigned int cos, i;
> + const unsigned int *ref = info->cos_ref;
> + const struct feat_node *feat;
> + unsigned int cos_max;
> +
> ASSERT(spin_is_locked(ref_lock));
>
> + /* cos_max is the one of the feature which is being set. */
> + feat = info->features[feat_type];
> + if ( !feat )
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + cos_max = feat->props->cos_max;
> +
> + for ( cos = 0; cos <= cos_max; cos++ )
> + {
> + const uint32_t *val_ptr = val;
> + bool found = false;
> +
> + if ( cos && !ref[cos] )
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * If fail to find cos in below loop, need find whole feature array
> + * again from beginning.
> + */
This comment is unrelated to any of the immediately surrounding
code. Either move it, or get rid of it altogether.
> + for ( i = 0; i < PSR_SOCKET_MAX_FEAT; i++ )
> + {
> + uint32_t default_val = 0;
Pointless initializer as it seems.
> + feat = info->features[i];
> + if ( !feat )
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * COS ID 0 always stores the default value so input 0 to get
> + * default value.
> + */
> + feat->props->get_val(feat, 0, &default_val);
> +
> + /*
> + * Compare value according to feature array order.
> + * We must follow this order because value array is assembled
> + * as this order.
> + */
> + if ( cos > feat->props->cos_max )
> + {
> + /*
> + * If cos is bigger than feature's cos_max, the val should be
> + * default value. Otherwise, it fails to find a COS ID. So we
> + * have to exit find flow.
> + */
> + if ( val[0] != default_val )
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + found = true;
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + if ( val[0] == feat->cos_reg_val[cos] )
> + found = true;
> + }
Same question as on previous patch- why val[0] twice above,
despite cos_num possibly being larger than 1? And wouldn't this
need to be val_ptr anyway?
> + /* If fail to match, go to next cos to compare. */
> + if ( !found )
> + break;
> +
> + val_ptr += feat->props->cos_num;
> + if ( val_ptr - val > array_len )
> + return -ENOSPC;
This again looks suspicious - the check should once again be done
before accessing the respective array element(s).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |