[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] xen/arm: Allow platforms to hook IRQ routing

[Chris Patterson <cjp256@xxxxxxxxx>]

From: "Chris Patterson" <pattersonc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Some common platforms (e.g. Tegra) have non-traditional IRQ controllers
that must be programmed in addition to their primary GICs-- and which
can come in unusual topologies. Device trees for targets that feature
these controllers often deviate from the conventions that Xen expects.

This commit provides a foundation for support of these platforms, by
allowing the platform to decide which IRQs can be routed by Xen, rather
than assuming that only GIC-connected IRQs can be routed.  This enables
platform specific logic to routing the IRQ to Xen and Guest.

As dt_irq_translate() is presently hard-coded to just support the
primary interrupt controller, instead rely on the newly added
platform_irq_is_routable() check instead.  The default behaviour of this
new function should be consistent with the previous checks for platforms
that do not implement it.

Authored-by: Kyle Temkin <temkink@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kyle Temkin <temkink@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Patterson <pattersonc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

changes since rfc:
- use bool instead of bool_t
- formatting & code style cleanup
- reuse dt_irq_translate() path and drop platform_irq_for_device() approach
- use const qualifier for platform_irq_is_routable rirq argument

---

 xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c    | 12 ++++++++----
 xen/arch/arm/irq.c             |  5 +++--
 xen/arch/arm/platform.c        | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 xen/common/device_tree.c       |  8 +++-----
 xen/include/asm-arm/platform.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index cb66304..92536dd 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -1120,12 +1120,16 @@ static int handle_device(struct domain *d, struct 
dt_device_node *dev,
 
         /*
          * Don't map IRQ that have no physical meaning
-         * ie: IRQ whose controller is not the GIC
+         * ie: IRQ that does not wind up being controlled by the GIC
+         * (Note that we can't just check to see if an IRQ is owned by the GIC,
+         *  as some platforms have a controller between the device irq and the 
GIC,
+         *  such as the Tegra legacy interrupt controller.)
          */
-        if ( rirq.controller != dt_interrupt_controller )
+        if ( !platform_irq_is_routable(&rirq) )
         {
-            dt_dprintk("irq %u not connected to primary controller. Connected 
to %s\n",
-                      i, dt_node_full_name(rirq.controller));
+            dt_dprintk("irq %u not (directly or indirectly) connected to 
primary"
+                        "controller. Connected to %s\n", i,
+                        dt_node_full_name(rirq.controller));
             continue;
         }
 
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
index f3f20a6..0b4eaa9 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/gic.h>
 #include <asm/vgic.h>
+#include <asm/platform.h>
 
 static unsigned int local_irqs_type[NR_LOCAL_IRQS];
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(local_irqs_type_lock);
@@ -369,7 +370,7 @@ int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned int irqflags, 
struct irqaction *new)
     /* First time the IRQ is setup */
     if ( disabled )
     {
-        gic_route_irq_to_xen(desc, GIC_PRI_IRQ);
+        platform_route_irq_to_xen(desc, GIC_PRI_IRQ);
         /* It's fine to use smp_processor_id() because:
          * For PPI: irq_desc is banked
          * For SPI: we don't care for now which CPU will receive the
@@ -506,7 +507,7 @@ int route_irq_to_guest(struct domain *d, unsigned int virq,
     if ( retval )
         goto out;
 
-    retval = gic_route_irq_to_guest(d, virq, desc, GIC_PRI_IRQ);
+    retval = platform_route_irq_to_guest(d, virq, desc, GIC_PRI_IRQ);
 
     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
 
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/platform.c b/xen/arch/arm/platform.c
index 0af6d57..539ee3b 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/platform.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/platform.c
@@ -147,6 +147,36 @@ bool_t platform_device_is_blacklisted(const struct 
dt_device_node *node)
     return (dt_match_node(blacklist, node) != NULL);
 }
 
+int platform_route_irq_to_guest(struct domain *d, unsigned int virq,
+                                struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int priority)
+{
+    if ( platform && platform->route_irq_to_guest )
+        return platform->route_irq_to_guest(d, virq, desc, priority);
+    else
+        return gic_route_irq_to_guest(d, virq, desc, priority);
+}
+
+void platform_route_irq_to_xen(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int priority)
+{
+    if ( platform && platform->route_irq_to_xen )
+        platform->route_irq_to_xen(desc, priority);
+    else
+        gic_route_irq_to_xen(desc, priority);
+}
+
+bool platform_irq_is_routable(const struct dt_raw_irq * rirq)
+{
+    /*
+     * If we have a platform-specific method to determine if an IRQ is 
routable,
+     * check that; otherwise fall back to checking to see if an IRQ belongs to
+     * the GIC.
+     */
+    if ( platform && platform->irq_is_routable )
+        return platform->irq_is_routable(rirq);
+    else
+        return (rirq->controller == dt_interrupt_controller);
+}
+
 /*
  * Local variables:
  * mode: C
diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c
index 7b009ea..061693b 100644
--- a/xen/common/device_tree.c
+++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include <xen/string.h>
 #include <xen/cpumask.h>
 #include <xen/ctype.h>
+#include <asm/platform.h>
 #include <asm/setup.h>
 #include <xen/err.h>
 
@@ -1467,11 +1468,8 @@ int dt_irq_translate(const struct dt_raw_irq *raw,
     ASSERT(dt_irq_xlate != NULL);
     ASSERT(dt_interrupt_controller != NULL);
 
-    /*
-     * TODO: Retrieve the right irq_xlate. This is only works for the primary
-     * interrupt controller.
-     */
-    if ( raw->controller != dt_interrupt_controller )
+    /* Only proceed with translation if the irq is routable on the platform. */
+    if ( !platform_irq_is_routable(raw) )
         return -EINVAL;
 
     return dt_irq_xlate(raw->specifier, raw->size,
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/platform.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/platform.h
index 08010ba..119ad2e 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/platform.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/platform.h
@@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ struct platform_desc {
     void (*reset)(void);
     /* Platform power-off */
     void (*poweroff)(void);
+    /* Platform-specific IRQ routing */
+    int (*route_irq_to_guest)(struct domain *d, unsigned int virq,
+                               struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int priority);
+    void (*route_irq_to_xen)(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int priority);
+    bool (*irq_is_routable)(const struct dt_raw_irq * rirq);
+
     /*
      * Platform quirks
      * Defined has a function because a platform can support multiple
@@ -56,6 +62,12 @@ int platform_cpu_up(int cpu);
 void platform_reset(void);
 void platform_poweroff(void);
 bool_t platform_has_quirk(uint32_t quirk);
+
+int platform_route_irq_to_guest(struct domain *d, unsigned int virq,
+                                 struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int priority);
+void platform_route_irq_to_xen(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int priority);
+bool platform_irq_is_routable(const struct dt_raw_irq *rirq);
+
 bool_t platform_device_is_blacklisted(const struct dt_device_node *node);
 
 #define PLATFORM_START(_name, _namestr)                         \
-- 
2.1.4


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel