Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: VMX: Simplify segment_base

[Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we use the read-only GDT here? When expanding the virtual address
>>> for 64-bit system descriptors, isn't it sufficient to check (d->s == 0
>>> && d->type != 0)?
>>
>> We can use the readonly GDT but I think doesn't matter one or the
>> other here. We have to check specific types for LDT or TSS, other
>> values describe other entries (cf Intel volume 3, 3.5) (for example 14
>> & 15 on 64-bits are for trap & interrupt gates).
>
> According to volume 3 of the SDM, section 3.5.2:
>
> The following system descriptors expand to 16 bytes:
> — Call gate descriptors (see Section 5.8.3.1, “IA-32e Mode Call Gates”)
> — IDT gate descriptors (see Section 6.14.1, “64-Bit Mode IDT”)
> — LDT and TSS descriptors (see Section 7.2.3, “TSS Descriptor in 64-bit 
> mode”).
>
> All legal system descriptor types (except for 0: Upper 8 bytes of an 16-byte
> descriptor) should get the high 32 bits of the base address from the next 
> 8-byte
> descriptor.
>

Ok, then I will test an updated version next week.

>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@xxxxxxxxxx> 
>>> wrote:
>>> > The KVM segment_base function is confusing. This patch replaces integers
>>> > with appropriate flags, simplify constructs and add comments.
>>> >
>>> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > ---
>>> > Based on next-20170213
>>> > ---
>>> >  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
>>> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>> >
>>> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> > index 99167f20bc34..edb8326108dd 100644
>>> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> > @@ -2062,25 +2062,35 @@ static unsigned long segment_base(u16 selector)
>>> >         struct desc_struct *d;
>>> >         unsigned long table_base;
>>> >         unsigned long v;
>>> > +       u32 high32;
>>> >
>>> > -       if (!(selector & ~3))
>>> > +       if (!(selector & ~SEGMENT_RPL_MASK))
>>> >                 return 0;
>>> >
>>> > -       table_base = get_current_gdt_rw_vaddr();
>>> > -
>>> > -       if (selector & 4) {           /* from ldt */
>>> > +       /* LDT selector */
>>> > +       if ((selector & SEGMENT_TI_MASK) == SEGMENT_LDT) {
>>> >                 u16 ldt_selector = kvm_read_ldt();
>>> >
>>> > -               if (!(ldt_selector & ~3))
>>> > +               if (!(ldt_selector & ~SEGMENT_RPL_MASK))
>>> >                         return 0;
>>> >
>>> >                 table_base = segment_base(ldt_selector);
>>> > +       } else {
>>> > +               table_base = get_current_gdt_rw_vaddr();
>>> >         }
>>> > -       d = (struct desc_struct *)(table_base + (selector & ~7));
>>> > +
>>> > +       d = (struct desc_struct *)table_base + (selector >> 3);
>>> >         v = get_desc_base(d);
>>> >  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>>> > -       if (d->s == 0 && (d->type == 2 || d->type == 9 || d->type == 11))
>>> > -               v |= ((unsigned long)((struct ldttss_desc64 *)d)->base3) 
>>> > << 32;
>>> > +       /*
>>> > +        * Extend the virtual address if we have a system descriptor 
>>> > entry for
>>> > +        * LDT or TSS (available or busy).
>>> > +        */
>>> > +       if (d->s == 0 && (d->type == DESC_LDT || d->type == DESC_TSS ||
>>> > +                         d->type == 11/*Busy TSS */)) {
>>> > +               high32 = ((struct ldttss_desc64 *)d)->base3;
>>> > +               v |= (u64)high32 << 32;
>>> > +       }
>>> >  #endif
>>> >         return v;
>>> >  }
>>> > --
>>> > 2.11.0.483.g087da7b7c-goog
>>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas



-- 
Thomas

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel