|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5 07/24] x86: refactor psr: implement get value flow.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 02:01:09PM +0800, Yi Sun wrote:
> This patch implements get value flow including L3 CAT callback
> function.
>
> It also changes domctl interface to make it more general.
>
> With this patch, 'psr-cat-show' can work for L3 CAT.
Could you add:
"but not for L3 code/data which is implemented in patch
titled XYZ" ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v5:
> - rename 'dat[]' to 'data[]'
> - modify variables names to make them better, e.g. 'feat_tmp' to 'feat'.
> - check if feature type match in caller of feature callback function.
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/domctl.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> xen/arch/x86/psr.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> xen/include/asm-x86/psr.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> index ab141b1..11d2127 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> @@ -1383,23 +1383,23 @@ long arch_do_domctl(
> break;
>
> case XEN_DOMCTL_PSR_CAT_OP_GET_L3_CBM:
> - ret = psr_get_l3_cbm(d, domctl->u.psr_cat_op.target,
> - &domctl->u.psr_cat_op.data,
> - PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3);
> + ret = psr_get_val(d, domctl->u.psr_cat_op.target,
> + &domctl->u.psr_cat_op.data,
> + PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3);
> copyback = 1;
> break;
>
> case XEN_DOMCTL_PSR_CAT_OP_GET_L3_CODE:
> - ret = psr_get_l3_cbm(d, domctl->u.psr_cat_op.target,
> - &domctl->u.psr_cat_op.data,
> - PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_CODE);
> + ret = psr_get_val(d, domctl->u.psr_cat_op.target,
> + &domctl->u.psr_cat_op.data,
> + PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_CODE);
> copyback = 1;
> break;
>
> case XEN_DOMCTL_PSR_CAT_OP_GET_L3_DATA:
> - ret = psr_get_l3_cbm(d, domctl->u.psr_cat_op.target,
> - &domctl->u.psr_cat_op.data,
> - PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_DATA);
> + ret = psr_get_val(d, domctl->u.psr_cat_op.target,
> + &domctl->u.psr_cat_op.data,
> + PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_DATA);
> copyback = 1;
> break;
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> index 319bfcc..3cbb60c 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ struct feat_ops {
> /* get_feat_info is used to get feature HW info. */
> bool (*get_feat_info)(const struct feat_node *feat,
> uint32_t data[], unsigned int array_len);
> + /* get_val is used to get feature COS register value. */
> + bool (*get_val)(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int cos,
> + enum cbm_type type, uint64_t *val);
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -251,9 +254,22 @@ static bool l3_cat_get_feat_info(const struct feat_node
> *feat,
> return true;
> }
>
> +static bool l3_cat_get_val(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int cos,
> + enum cbm_type type, uint64_t *val)
> +{
> + if ( cos > feat->info.l3_cat_info.cos_max )
> + /* Use default value. */
> + cos = 0;
> +
> + *val = feat->cos_reg_val[cos];
Extra space there. No need for it.
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static const struct feat_ops l3_cat_ops = {
> .get_cos_max = l3_cat_get_cos_max,
> .get_feat_info = l3_cat_get_feat_info,
> + .get_val = l3_cat_get_val,
> };
>
> static void __init parse_psr_bool(char *s, char *value, char *feature,
> @@ -498,10 +514,29 @@ int psr_get_info(unsigned int socket, enum cbm_type
> type,
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> -int psr_get_l3_cbm(struct domain *d, unsigned int socket,
> - uint64_t *cbm, enum cbm_type type)
> +int psr_get_val(struct domain *d, unsigned int socket,
> + uint64_t *val, enum cbm_type type)
> {
> - return 0;
> + const struct psr_socket_info *info = get_socket_info(socket);
> + unsigned int cos = d->arch.psr_cos_ids[socket];
> + const struct feat_node *feat;
> + enum psr_feat_type feat_type;
> +
> + if ( IS_ERR(info) )
> + return PTR_ERR(info);
> +
> + feat_type = psr_cbm_type_to_feat_type(type);
> + list_for_each_entry(feat, &info->feat_list, list)
> + {
> + if ( feat->feature != feat_type )
> + continue;
> +
> + if ( feat->ops.get_val(feat, cos, type, val) )
> + /* Found */
No need. The 'psr_get_info' does not have this.
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return -ENOENT;
This function looks quite similar to 'psr_get_info'.
Perhaps it may make sense to have an common one that has an
extra argument (whether to call get_val or get_feat_info)?
And then psr_get_val and psr_get_info can call in this common
code with this extra argument attached?
> }
>
> int psr_set_l3_cbm(struct domain *d, unsigned int socket,
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/psr.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/psr.h
> index e3b18bc..d50e359 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/psr.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/psr.h
> @@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ void psr_ctxt_switch_to(struct domain *d);
>
> int psr_get_info(unsigned int socket, enum cbm_type type,
> uint32_t data[], unsigned int array_len);
> -int psr_get_l3_cbm(struct domain *d, unsigned int socket,
> - uint64_t *cbm, enum cbm_type type);
> +int psr_get_val(struct domain *d, unsigned int socket,
> + uint64_t *val, enum cbm_type type);
> int psr_set_l3_cbm(struct domain *d, unsigned int socket,
> uint64_t cbm, enum cbm_type type);
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |