Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 104728: regressions - FAIL

[Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 27 January 2017 09:00
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; osstest-
> admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 104728: regressions - FAIL
> 
> >>> On 27.01.17 at 05:47, <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > flight 104728 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104728/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail
> REGR. vs. 104681
> >  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-
> install fail REGR. vs. 104681
> >  test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-
> install fail REGR. vs. 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel  9 redhat-install   fail REGR. vs.
> 104681
> >  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install
> fail REGR. vs. 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-
> install fail REGR. vs. 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel  9 redhat-install   fail REGR. vs.
> 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail
> REGR. vs. 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install
> fail REGR. vs. 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install
> fail REGR. vs. 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-
> hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd  9 redhat-install     fail REGR. vs.
> 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd  9 redhat-install     fail REGR. vs.
> 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs.
> 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3  9 windows-install     fail REGR. vs.
> 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3  9 windows-install     fail REGR. vs.
> 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 9 windows-install fail REGR.
> vs. 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 9 windows-install fail REGR.
> vs. 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64  9 windows-install   fail REGR. vs.
> 104681
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64  9 windows-install   fail REGR. vs.
> 104681
> 
> The overwhelming majority of failures being test-amd64-i386-*
> ones, I think the primary suspect is an issue in compat mode handling
> of dmop.
> 
> The others are test-amd64-amd64-*-xsm ones, which are - seeing
> lots of
> 
> (XEN) avc:  denied  { dm } for domid=0 target=1
> scontext=system_u:system_r:dom0_t
> tcontext=system_u:system_r:domU_t tclass=hvm
> 
> in the logs - dmop fallout too as it looks.

Ok. I'm going to need to set up a repro environment with a 32-bit dom0. Should 
hopefully have something this afternoon.

  Paul

> 
> Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel