Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 [and 1 more messages]

[Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Boris Ostrovsky writes ("Re: [linux-linus bisection] complete 
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 [and 1 more messages]"):
> On 01/19/2017 01:05 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > This means that the bug is in commits which diverged before the last
> > pass of this test.
> >
> > (Did your filters get you a copy of the bisection email?)
> 
> No, I haven't set a filter for the bisector but I did see this message
> and didn't find bisection results particularly useful. bcc981e9ed84 is
> from about a year ago, which, I think, is when you stopped running this
> test. And so the question might be whether "Bug not present" is really true?

It means that this precise combination of software was tested and
passed, recently, on the same hosts, several times.

See
  
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/linux-linus/test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64.xen-boot.html
where you can see the flight numbers.  (They are sequential.)

So yes it is really true.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel