[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 03/10] x86/HVM: Call vlapic_destroy after vcpu_destroy

[Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>]

Since vlapic_init() is called before vcpu_initialise().
We should call the destroy functions in the the reverse order here.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
index 25dc759..d573f0f 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
@@ -1613,10 +1613,10 @@ void hvm_vcpu_destroy(struct vcpu *v)
     tasklet_kill(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.assert_evtchn_irq_tasklet);
     hvm_vcpu_cacheattr_destroy(v);
 
+    hvm_funcs.vcpu_destroy(v);
+
     if ( is_hvm_vcpu(v) )
         vlapic_destroy(v);
-
-    hvm_funcs.vcpu_destroy(v);
 }
 
 void hvm_vcpu_down(struct vcpu *v)
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel