Re: [Xen-devel] elbling1 (was Re: [xen-unstable test] 103788: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass)

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 22.12.16 at 14:47, <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] elbling1 (was Re: [xen-unstable test] 
> 103788: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass)"):
>> On 22.12.16 at 13:19, <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Perhaps it would be worth telling Xen not to reboot on crash...
>> 
>> I think that's worth giving a try (I assume that some timeout will cause
>> the machine to get rebooted at some point anyway, to make it available
>> again).
> 
> Like this, then, AFAICT from the docs.

Yes.

>  FAOD, this shouldn't affect
> deliberate attempts by the dom0 to reboot the host ?

Correct. (I use "noreboot" or its more modern "reboot=no"
equivalent everywhere, and can confirm deliberate reboots
work fine.)

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel